View Full Version : [VS] vs LR/CC 14-6 ( Clanwar results )
Sasik
Dec 11, 2004, 01:19 PM
Today, we have played cw against LR. LR used CC’ers in game, but it doesn’t matter :p We have played 4 rounds, till 5 on each and also each round had a timelimit – 20 min. We chose Zaitox and Jungles Edge, and LR chose Distopia and Semi. The game was really exciting and very close. We had some troubles with the server, but it wasn’t laggy at all. Thx to FireSworD who hosted 3 rounds ( I don’t know why he was gone after the 3rd round ;P ). Cloud hosted the last one.
Round 1: Zaitox Station 67
VS lineup: Sasik, Sylver, Cloud ( blue )
LR lineup: CraccoBoy, Vegito, Grytolle ( red )
Score: 2-2
Round 2: Happy Semiconductor CTF
VS lineup: Sasik, Sylver, Cloud ( red )
LR lineup: CraccoBoy, Vegito, Grytolle ( blue )
Score: 2-2
Round 3: Distopia
VS lineup: Sasik, Sylver, Yum ( red )
LR lineup: CraccoBoy, Vegito, Grytolle ( blue )
Score: 5-1 for VS
Round 4: Jungles Edge
VS lineup: Sasik, Sylver, Yum ( blue )
LR lineup: Grytolle, Seph, Skilledplayer ( red )
Score: 5-1 for VS
So VS won the whole cw 14-6.
Those were good games :p Thx for playing. I wish GL to our opponents in the future.
FireSworD
Dec 11, 2004, 01:29 PM
Haha. Sorry about the last round. I had warned Sasik earlier in the week of problems that would occur in my server but he insisted that I host the war anyway.
So don't blame me for anything. ;P
NeoBlaze
Dec 11, 2004, 02:00 PM
What is this?
Why are our people renamed?
This is no fair way to host a game...
[PiZZa: Severe filter bypass removal. This has resulted in a full warning. Never attempt to bypass the filter.]
blurredd
Dec 11, 2004, 02:10 PM
Last time I checked, renaming other players in a server doesn't affect the outcome of the game. Plus it wasn't the server that did the renaming anyway. But it wasn't a good idea to upload that screenshot either.
Newspaz
Dec 11, 2004, 04:26 PM
ROTFL. Way to go Yum. That screenshot is great.
Chiyu
Dec 11, 2004, 04:43 PM
Rename the thread. You can not call it VS vs CC.
CC vs VS was 2-0, remember?
If it was VS vs CC we wouldn't have used a team like this (we would've used Anakin and maybe Tidus and Scare) and picked DW. Veg and me were just helping Gry out, that's all.
If you'd like a rematch against CC, please tell me Sasik.
Newspaz
Dec 11, 2004, 04:48 PM
Hey, CB. That's the risk of multiclanning man. Things just aren't clear enough.
Nimrod
Dec 11, 2004, 04:50 PM
Heh, VS lost against CC in a clanmatch... I hardly think you can attack a clan thats beaten you and you still havent beaten them.
Attack the ones above you heh? Quite low.
Chiyu
Dec 11, 2004, 05:00 PM
For once I agree with you Newspaz.
Veg and me have already decided to stop fighting for LR, to avoid things like this happening again.
But we should do a real CC vs VS soon anyway, just so we can see if VS really defeats CC (like you're claiming) or not. With our own warteam. Since you have never really beaten CC, it will be a good chance for you to do so. How about it, Sasik?
R3ptile
Dec 12, 2004, 12:25 AM
GG, GJ, etc... VS owns =D
Superjazz
Dec 12, 2004, 12:48 AM
Hehe CB. Don't underestimate VS like that. =D
They even won us in jj2wc as our team didn't have enough good teamwork. They are practising themselves almost every day, and I've been playing with them sometimes in their trainings. It's really fun to play with them as they don't complain and they're fair.
But GpW will have a rematch with VS sometime hopefully. Let's see. ;)
Vegito
Dec 12, 2004, 01:31 AM
Yah, we can do a CW Sasik. u haven't beaten CC yet.
"Today, we have played cw against LR. You can call it also cw VS vs CC, because LR used CC’ers in game, but it doesn’t matter"
Foo, it does matter. It was only me and CB helping Gry out.
I'm not gonna do that again.
It was LR which was playing. Not CC.
Try us Sasik. Then you'll see.
R3ptile
Dec 12, 2004, 02:24 AM
Yah, we can do a CW Sasik. u haven't beaten CC yet.
"Today, we have played cw against LR. You can call it also cw VS vs CC, because LR used CC’ers in game, but it doesn’t matter"
Foo, it does matter. It was only me and CB helping Gry out.
I'm not gonna do that again.
It doesn't make sense. It was more like CC + Grytolle IMO. :p
ShadowGPW
Dec 12, 2004, 02:28 AM
Clans @ Whine mode at an Internet forum rules :7
DarkSonic
Dec 12, 2004, 02:59 AM
Yes, indeed. VS was underestimated in my start of JJ2, and now, they're one of the best clans(surely the best Polish clan). We had PPC before them, but since they fused with RHSP, VS got better. Now, Sasik and Sylver are ppl who are great in teamplaying(I noticed, because I did many 2 vs 2/3 vs 3 with them).
[GpW]Urbs
Dec 12, 2004, 03:11 AM
Firstly VS is one of the best JJ2 clans ATM. They are active, and have great teamplay. They're everything a clan should be. So underestimation is out of the question.
Secondly, GJ for quitting that multiclanning deal CB, it was really weird and all. I wouldn't have minded, if CC was reall out of JJ2 as you said. But seeing you guys still play on JJ2, u shouldn't be in both clans.
Well I hope you guys had a nice game, and I'm hoping to see CC vs VS, or?:)
BTW vegito, "only you and cb", made 2 thirds of the LR warteam. So i would hardly use the word only...
Enigma
Dec 12, 2004, 03:46 AM
Let's call it a 3vs3. Happy?
Seriously, if you're going to get upset about CC being dragged into this, stop doing that semi-merge stuff (or whatever you like to call it) with other clans. It's confusing and leads to situations like the above. Although I must agree that changing the names of your opponents and then posting the screenshot isn't the brightest idea if VS doesn't want to get into a flamewar.
Sasik
Dec 12, 2004, 04:55 AM
LR team consisted in ~66% of CC members, that is why I called cw VS vs LR/CC. But officially we have played against LR.
Also, as I said we just had to rename players, it was because of server problems. I don't want to quarrel with you.
Btw. LR'ers also renamed their nicknames themselves, CB played as Jun, Veg as Jen or someone etc.
CW ? Sure, np =P We can play during Christmas, because I won't be online next weekend.
I will talk with you CB later about the cw rules.
And btw. Thx for nice commets about VS :-)
Grytolle
Dec 12, 2004, 09:29 AM
Well, VS won..we had needed anakin. Now we've had a divorce w/ CC and LR stands on it's own. CC has taught us a lot and I am still a friend of Craccoboy's. And I think it would be VERY weak of both clans not to face eachother again...Hence: Yay for a REAL CC-VS CW. GL both teams... oh, btw...I am still in CC as some kind of member:S
Anubis
Dec 29, 2004, 09:46 AM
Too bad that we lost =(
Why the # didn't Seph play in Distopia? He owns CelL there!
cooba
Dec 29, 2004, 10:16 AM
Why the # couldn't you leave this thread buried? It's old!
CrashMash
Dec 29, 2004, 11:48 AM
Alex, Seph doesnt "OWN" srry for reviving.
Anubis
Dec 30, 2004, 06:27 AM
CrashMash, Seph is one of the best in LR. CelL sux in distopia :p
Gr33n Pl4nt
Dec 31, 2004, 08:12 AM
Actually CelL can own your whole clan and all of its associates in Distopia ;l.
CrashMash
Dec 31, 2004, 09:08 AM
AGREED GREEN PLANT :)
CrashMash
Jan 12, 2005, 08:26 AM
testtest
R3ptile
Jan 12, 2005, 08:59 AM
testtest
Stop the spam. :rolleyes:
CrashMash
Jan 12, 2005, 09:59 AM
yeah srry r3p, u can delete that post/ or an admin can, or i do :P
Anubis
Jan 13, 2005, 09:57 AM
Seph already owned CelL in Distopia 5-3.
R3ptile
Jan 13, 2005, 10:14 AM
Seph already owned CelL in Distopia 5-3.
Only one duel doesn't count. You also can't call 5-3 "ownage".
Nielsje
Jan 13, 2005, 10:52 AM
CelL could have had a bad day. Still, I don't care. As if Distopia is representative for the quality of a player.
Ragnarok!
Jan 13, 2005, 01:02 PM
I havent played in a CW for ages.. :(
SkulL
Jan 14, 2005, 01:05 PM
Seph already owned CelL in Distopia 5-3.
First Seph hosted that duel if I have something like 800 ms in seph's server Cell gets something like that, even more.
And you forgot to mention Cell defeated him in zaitox and semi 5-1 twice or 5-2 so you can't say "Seph owned Cell" you got some issues man.
Grytolle
Jan 16, 2005, 01:34 AM
I'm afraid they have a point, Alex...
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.