PDA

View Full Version : Odin

Stijn
Jan 30, 2005, 07:05 AM
Is it actually allowed to bump 4-year old topics with no reason at all?
Odin
Jan 30, 2005, 08:29 AM
Holy crap! A whole thread dedicated to ME.

This topic sucks. Let's talk about how cool I am.
n00b
Jan 30, 2005, 09:31 AM
Odin-without the old link in his signature, I would have never found Firefox.
Thats why he's cool. The end
Tubz
Jan 30, 2005, 11:24 AM
You really should go around putting random companies.com in your URLs that's how I find a good majority of websites.

~3dfx.com
~websters.com
~encarta.com
~microsoft.com

etc...
Odin
Jan 30, 2005, 06:37 PM
You forgot en.wikipedia.org.
JelZe GoldRabbit
Jan 31, 2005, 04:02 AM
To prevent this topic from digressing any further:

The rules don't say anything about reviving old topics, so it's perfectly allowed. Just keep in mind reviving can be annoying, especially if it's done for no reason, or if the post has no significance. The latter goes for all topics no matter how old. In either case the topic can be closed. It's plain common sense, and it's applied to all topics, even old ones.

- JelZe GoldRabbit =:3
cooba
Jan 31, 2005, 04:25 AM
Just keep in mind reviving can be annoying, especially if it's done for no reason, or if the post has no significance.So why not forbid it?
FQuist
Jan 31, 2005, 05:13 AM
Generally reviving threads for non-useful reasons is discouraged or (AFAIK) disallowed by the admins. Odin was warned after a few revivals to quit it but continued, so what he did was against the rules. And we're discussing about how to repair those topics.
Tubz
Jan 31, 2005, 07:24 AM
Yep, It's: you can revive a topic as long as you have something useful that is relative to the topic.