View Full Version : Would you like to have all JJ2 on the same version?
Violet CLM
Jul 10, 2007, 09:21 PM
For the purposes of this poll, it doesn't matter if we're talking about 1.23, 1.24, 1.25, or anything. Imagine that everyone who played JJ2 used the same version of JJ2, and could all join each other's servers. Would you mind?
EDIT: I'm not talking about any sort of filter. Just somehow, I dunno how, <i>everyone</i> used the same version. The idea behind this topic is to better quantify who is arguing against a single-version community for reasons of legality and practicality (I.E. patching everyone's games), and who is arguing against it on the basis of not wanting to associate with people from a different version, for whatever reasons, with no value judgement being passed thereon.
Neobeo
Jul 10, 2007, 09:40 PM
No. (I wouldn't mind.)
Grytolle
Jul 10, 2007, 11:29 PM
The question is weirdly posed, since it suggest it would be by filtering the list server (which is a truly stupid idea).
FireSworD
Jul 10, 2007, 11:51 PM
The 1.23 players should start playing more on 1.24 but however not completely abandoning 1.23 if they don't want to. Simple as that.
wrecker
Jul 11, 2007, 12:53 AM
Yes, it would be good, but I must note only versions up to 1.23 are sold worldwide. TSF (:lori: 1.24) is only sold in Europe. I used to have 1.23, but I lost the CD ,and when I got TSF, i figured out I couldn't anymore play with the guys I used to play with in 1.23. Also, 1.23 seems to be preferred in USA, whilst Europe moved to 1.24.
NovaStar
Jul 11, 2007, 01:37 AM
1.23 and HH98 were probably the only versions that ever saw the light of day for a short time here.
Xobim
Jul 11, 2007, 01:44 AM
You mean splitting up the list servers? I don't see anything useful in that, because people with TSF are able to join a 1.23 game with that neat little program by Overlord...
Grytolle
Jul 11, 2007, 02:07 AM
Or more easily with a hex-edited .exe, such as TEC.exe
Xobim
Jul 11, 2007, 02:57 AM
Why is everything about hex-editing?!?!
Grytolle
Jul 11, 2007, 04:03 AM
Why is everything about hex-editing?!?!What are you talking about?
n00b
Jul 11, 2007, 04:12 AM
Sure if somehow someway everyone was using the same version, a one server listserver is good.
But this is not the case, so therefore I vote no. Especially since it really screws up my yearly tradition of hosting Xmas servers on HH98
Neobeo
Jul 11, 2007, 04:16 AM
I am not entirely sure what the question means by one-version server list, but when hosting a server I'd prefer it to be able to accept clients from both 1.23 and TSF (and all other versions).
Torkell
Jul 11, 2007, 04:43 AM
Your question in the post and in the poll are different.
Answering the question in the poll: yes, having the community use a unifed version of JJ2 would be good. Note that I'm saying a unified version rather than specifically 1.23 or 1.24.
Answering the question in the post: no, I don't mind, having not played online for over two years. Outright distribution of 1.24 is illegal, but if a patch appeared to make 1.23 compatible (regardless of if the patch fixes bugs or not), then I'd use it.
ShadeJackrabbit
Jul 11, 2007, 08:16 AM
What Torkell said.
Birdie
Jul 11, 2007, 08:58 AM
I'm so confused about the poll. Does Yes mean that we don't want such a thing? (The question in your post and poll yes and no mean different things.)
Anyways, I would mind. It would mean less people playing my version probably, but many of those people don't even know how to run in the game. Let alone speak English.
ShadeJackrabbit
Jul 11, 2007, 09:14 AM
I think what he means is either releasing a 1.25 upgrade which sort of combines 1.23 and 1.24 or making a server/client program which lets all versions join all servers. Yes if you want that.
(Just my interpretation.)
sonicnathan 1
Jul 11, 2007, 09:34 AM
I don't really care. A 1 server list is a good idea. But I think that we should continue to use the versi0on we have right now.
Violet CLM
Jul 11, 2007, 09:50 AM
Yes and No are determined by the poll, not the post. Sorry.
Bobby aka Dizzy
Jul 11, 2007, 07:29 PM
If we want to really ask this question it might be best to have a new poll where things are phrased so there is less confusion.
Monolith
Jul 11, 2007, 09:32 PM
I don't understand the question. Please clarify by rephrasing the question or explain what each of the options mean more clearly.
Cpp
Jul 13, 2007, 11:36 AM
Having a list server that displays all jj2 servers under a constant version ID (regardless of the version used) is a bad idea. Remember that you cannot always successfully join a server when your version is different. Take 1.23 and 1.24 for example. If you were to use 1.23 to join a 1.24 server that hosts a TSF level/tileset then you would get an error.
If you're speaking of a common version (sort of as if suddenly all different jj2 versions would get magically replaced by a common version such as 1.25 worldwide) then yes, that would bring the community together. It would be nice, but impossible to achieve.
Still the best practical solution would be to use a kind of servers that can accept clients of any version and allow them to play a common game.
FreeFull
Jul 13, 2007, 12:27 PM
Don't do anything to the server. Make a program that I suggested in the other topic.
ThunderPX
Jul 13, 2007, 12:46 PM
Don't do anything to the server. Make a program that I suggested in the other topic.
You can't just convert TSF tilesets and whatnot to 1.23 on the fly. 1.23's size restrictions are stricter, so it would be impossible to keep the tileset intact.
Grytolle
Jul 13, 2007, 01:56 PM
well hax 1.23!!
Sasik
Jul 13, 2007, 02:16 PM
The 1.23 players should start playing more on 1.24 but however not completely abandoning 1.23 if they don't want to. Simple as that.
What about to make the upcoming JDC season as 1.24 only? I mean playing the events at TSF this time etc. It could somehow force players from 1.23 to play 1.24 and also show the people from 1.24 what is JDC etc., which could help in getting them involved more in the jj2 community. I mean in THIS community, of course.
I know this isn't the topic to discuss this. I just thought about this idea now and I felt like sharing it with others. :-)
FireSworD
Jul 13, 2007, 02:39 PM
We have decided to use a forest + carrotade method for euro events. If you don't know, it means 1.23 and 1.24 players could participate.
FreeFull
Jul 13, 2007, 03:06 PM
Sasik, some people don't have 1.24 and won't just buy it for JDC if they aren't good players. And even the good players might not be able to get 1.24.
Grytolle
Jul 13, 2007, 03:21 PM
warez, for the love of god. warez
FreeFull
Jul 13, 2007, 03:32 PM
I'm assuming these people won't download warez.
Grytolle
Jul 13, 2007, 03:41 PM
thats silly of you.
Dermo
Jul 13, 2007, 07:14 PM
You can't just convert TSF tilesets and whatnot to 1.23 on the fly. 1.23's size restrictions are stricter, so it would be impossible to keep the tileset intact.
well hax 1.23!!
hmmm that looks like CRC and filesize check issues plus some version compatibility issues that could be fixed easily that's beyond my knowledge though. good luck ppl!
Odin
Jul 13, 2007, 10:15 PM
I interpreted this post as "if the entire world have 1.23/1.24/whatever and used it as the standard JJ2, would you like it?"
Yeah.
ThunderPX
Jul 14, 2007, 06:25 AM
hmmm that looks like CRC and filesize check issues plus some version compatibility issues that could be fixed easily that's beyond my knowledge though. good luck ppl!
1.24 tilesets can have more tiles. You can't just chop tiles off so it works in 1.23. You can leave some eyecandy out and recompile it if you really want it to work in 1.23, but that really won't work on-the-fly, for obvious reasons.
FreeFull
Jul 14, 2007, 07:11 AM
I meant recompiling on the fly the tilesets and levels which aren't too big.
cooba
Jul 14, 2007, 07:36 AM
Then why won't <s>you</s> we just move to TSF altogether? I don't know about you, but four times larger tilesets are quite a benefit.Also, since all programs are written for 1.23Does "all programs" refer to anything else than all the stupid "secret" J2NSM utilities like Warpzor? Because if not, Carrotade works pretty well on TSF.
ThunderPX
Jul 14, 2007, 09:40 AM
I meant recompiling on the fly the tilesets and levels which aren't too big.
Maybe you should start explaining things in the first place instead of continuously assuming we'll understand.
Grytolle
Jul 14, 2007, 04:06 PM
Then why won't <s>you</s> we just move to TSF altogether? I don't know about you, but four times larger tile sets are quite a benefit.Does "all programs" refer to anything else than all the stupid "secret" J2NSM utilities like Warpzor? Because if not, Carrotade works pretty well on TSF.Well, all features are developed for 1.23 and then converted to 1 or 2 TSF versions. Besides, Carrotade had lots of bugs in the past release in 1.24 (haven't really used the latest version yet). Big tilesets might be a benefit, but it's very minor since it won't improve the game play at all, and thus not be reason enough to change. Best would be if everyone just hosted multi version and were happi (which would admittedly be easier if I would bother uploading forest as is).
And yes, J2NSM is all about stupid secret programs... like openjazz2 (not to mention major parts of mentioned program).
Odin
Jul 15, 2007, 06:16 AM
Well, all features are developed for 1.23 and then converted to 1 or 2 TSF versions. Besides, Carrotade had lots of bugs in the past release in 1.24 (haven't really used the latest version yet). Big tilesets might be a benefit, but it's very minor since it won't improve the game play at all, and thus not be reason enough to change. Best would be if everyone just hosted multi version and were happi (which would admittedly be easier if I would bother uploading forest as is).
And yes, J2NSM is all about stupid secret programs... like openjazz2 (not to mention major parts of mentioned program).
Problem is though is that pretty much 70% of all servers are 1.24. Even if it's not a big step up, it's still a really annoying barrier that seperates and divides the community.
MoonBlazE
Jul 16, 2007, 11:47 PM
I think the question roams down to what people prefer than what is the wisest and most beneficial decision. I don't think there's that many 1.23 players that couldn't access a TSF server if needed be, I simply think they choose not to because the expansion set was in itself kind of stupid and there wasn't much of a reason to stop playing on the same server as your friends did for the sake of a tile set increase and an unfunctional character that didn't even support proper customization.
That’s the problem with any online game that receives an expansion in same likeness. If you look at WarCraft 3, 30% of WC3’s battle.net games still occur on the original game. I don’t think it’s ever going to change because you can’t force people to play your preference.
Violet CLM
Jul 17, 2007, 01:09 AM
To be fair, TSF also changes how powered-up ice works. :)
Odin
Jul 17, 2007, 02:10 AM
To be fair, TSF also changes how powered-up ice works. :)
Went from bad to worse.
Violet CLM
Jul 17, 2007, 12:49 PM
No argument. But I thought it was worth pointing out that there are more changes between 1.23 and 1.24 than just Lori and tilesets. As I recall, 1.24 has more memory available, and supports more episode files, for instance. And really, I wouldn't be surprised if there were other changes that people just don't know about.
Odin
Jul 18, 2007, 12:34 AM
No argument. But I thought it was worth pointing out that there are more changes between 1.23 and 1.24 than just Lori and tilesets. As I recall, 1.24 has more memory available, and supports more episode files, for instance. And really, I wouldn't be surprised if there were other changes that people just don't know about.
1.24 supporting more episodes and having more memory is a much larger improvement and more noteworthy to use in your arguement than the insignificant change of how the powered-up freezer weapon works. But I digress.
MoonBlazE
Jul 18, 2007, 09:39 AM
It also has a sexier start up screen.
Michael
Jul 28, 2007, 08:25 AM
Yes, it would unite all the players of the already small online scene, instead of seperating it more. We can't afford to be in groups.
Dermo
Jul 28, 2007, 08:26 AM
Stop reviving this old thread plz.
Grytolle
Jul 28, 2007, 08:59 AM
Why aren't he allowed to revive this? It's still a relevant topic, and the point is to express one's opinion. Making such posts like yours sucks, drmoo. I still think it would be good if it was all in one version, but I don't see any good way of doing it at this time.
Violet CLM
Jul 28, 2007, 12:14 PM
We have decided to use a forest + carrotade method for euro events. If you don't know, it means 1.23 and 1.24 players could participate.
I, myself, am curious as to what this means. Is this something that could be generalized so that anyone hosting a server could be joined by both 1.23 and 1.24? If so, that would seem to at least go close to solving the problem.
Grytolle
Jul 29, 2007, 04:03 AM
Any server hosted with my multi-version hack enabled can be joined by players of all versions, with whatever issues that brings (in the case of 1.23 and 1.24, messed up anims - not big of a deal)
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.