PDA

View Full Version : Bla bla bla jdc is bull(-)(-)(-)(-) these days


shaney
Jul 16, 2010, 02:10 PM
i have been ion 2 months host a server like 5 times only things i saw was noobs noobs noobs . and some old jazzers and quite a few i know . jj2 is still alive i know


but please for god damn sakes jdc is such an old system points per duel per event (not that imk interested or what but just incase)



jdc needs to change its format let every participant fight each other in a league type .


10 mins of pure duel doesnt matter how many times u kill some one 3 points for win 1 point per eacht player if the scores are equal . for the stupid (-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-) lameasses that still think jdc is good to fraud .



then have the event part 3 v 3 etc just fo0r a like event winner all over by wins etc . 1 event per day . 3 v 3 (spont events will count only for half points ) 2 v 2 will be seperated .


my question is u dig or u dont dig

Violet CLM
Jul 16, 2010, 05:00 PM
I don't understand what you're trying to say, so I suspect I do not dig.

Obi1mcd
Jul 16, 2010, 05:14 PM
By 'do u dig' do you mean "Do you like the JDC system?" Or 'do like what I suggested in my post?'

Toni
Jul 17, 2010, 02:05 AM
I think JDC keep JJ2 alive a little bit. In middle between every JDC, JJ2 is .. well.. a little bit weak with players.

CrimiClown
Jul 17, 2010, 06:14 AM
I don't dig, I don't own a shovel. By the way, JDC has never been fun or fair or fun or maybe a FUNFAIR.

Shelly
Aug 3, 2010, 07:50 AM
Hi shaney! (It's me KIttiehCC)

I do agree the Jdc point system is kinda bull(-)(-)(-)(-), i won against grytolle's brother 5-1 and got 80 points.. that means that if i win like 10 matches in a 5-1 ratio id become first place, and i suck as hell.
Dig.

Toni
Aug 3, 2010, 10:25 AM
Hahahahaha that's not true. Try to understand formula...

Vegito
Aug 3, 2010, 01:30 PM
Hi shaney! (It's me KIttiehCC)

I do agree the Jdc point system is kinda bull(-)(-)(-)(-), i won against grytolle's brother 5-1 and got 80 points.. that means that if i win like 10 matches in a 5-1 ratio id become first place, and i suck as hell.
Dig.

Lol.

plunK
Aug 5, 2010, 06:57 AM
JDC is for FUN. Ratios, winning, streaks...blah blah blah they have a system, and it seems to generate a score roughly aquanited to how much you play/ how well you do. Besides that, is it really a big deal. I mean, except for a few of the more hardcore participants, is there anyone playing specifically to win? I'm not, and in recent seasons of jdc ive done most of the people I play done care terrible much about winning it either, so even if the scoring is not perfect, it serves its purpose for the 95+% of JDC players who are in for the fun.

That's just my 2 bits on the topic

Lithium
Aug 5, 2010, 08:51 AM
Forgive me if I don't care about the JDC system.

Shelly
Aug 6, 2010, 04:58 AM
Forgive me if I don't care about the JDC system.

I forgive you :D

Anubis
Aug 9, 2010, 04:26 PM
The JDC system should stay the same because it encourages more activity in JJ2 during the JDC seasons. If you want a tournament your way, then make one. It's the easy point system that makes people play JDC so much. No one will remember your rank a year later, unless you were in top 3 or something, which mostly a small group of people achieve because they're playing a lot of events and really trying to win, JDC is basically only a serious competition among a minority of people. Do I remember my rank or points from the past JDC seasons? No. But I remember a lot of fun games I played, a lot of events, fun awards etc and I like playing JDC the way it is even though I wouldn't care even if you changed my points to 0.

plunK
Aug 10, 2010, 06:46 AM
If you want a tournament your way, then make one. It's the easy point system that makes people play JDC so much.

Agreed. I know from experience with other games like the Unreal franchise, if you change up the scoring and rules every time a major tournament is hosted, it tends to confuse several people and slowly deter the numbers of participants. Not drastically, but enough that for a game like this it be better to leave it

FawFul
Aug 10, 2010, 11:17 AM
I agree with the posts above aswell, although it starts to be pathetic that some guy starts to win season after season now.

Grmbl Sj. :p

Toni
Aug 13, 2010, 03:18 AM
The JDC system should stay the same because it encourages more activity in JJ2 during the JDC seasons. If you want a tournament your way, then make one. It's the easy point system that makes people play JDC so much. No one will remember your rank a year later, unless you were in top 3 or something, which mostly a small group of people achieve because they're playing a lot of events and really trying to win, JDC is basically only a serious competition among a minority of people. Do I remember my rank or points from the past JDC seasons? No. But I remember a lot of fun games I played, a lot of events, fun awards etc and I like playing JDC the way it is even though I wouldn't care even if you changed my points to 0.

Agree. As I told up there, JJ2 is inactive between JDC seasons. JDC still keeps JJ2 a little bit active