Log in

View Full Version : Unfair ratings on J2O


BlazinDragon
Jan 18, 2003, 01:43 PM
at: http://www.jazz2online.com/downloads/moreinfo.php?levelid=2005

On my recreation of team battle a person, "ninjaur" on j2o rated it highly unfairly!!! a 3.2 for an excellent conversion which others rated it 7-8! the average was 7.7 before he rated it like that! I think an admin should eiter delete that review because it was UNFAIRLY rated. One of the rules on J2O was no ratings that were too high for friends or too low. rate according to lvl status:

Posted by ninjaur:

"Is kind of proud ;p"
Yeah...i wonder why..

This is just a recreate of a level, that had a better tileset, so in my opinion is trash..However the tiles were used good, I'd give this a 1.5
but that would be kinda low for "1 1/4 days" so a 3.2 it is.


Isnt this so unfair? Moonblaze seems a more resonably lvl rater than that ninjaur.

Admins of j2o could u plz edit or delete his post?

plz tanx

Derby: Personal attack removal.

Fawriel
Jan 18, 2003, 01:50 PM
Why don't you just pm a moderator? ;)
It worked when I got a 1.0 rating!^.~

Tubz
Jan 18, 2003, 02:06 PM
That's kinda sad, but it's easy to flame/personal attack people on J2O. I did it once to one guy, and he did it back at me, admins didn't notice it.

You'll have to deal with what people say. Notice how a lot of people flame/personal attack hotel levels.

Blackraptor
Jan 18, 2003, 02:37 PM
Yeah, the same thing happend to violets magic carrot, but i PM'd an admin (either Derby o Bobby, forgot who) and they deleted it. Now, the same person who posted that unfair review posted the same review again, this time, the admins deleted them by themselves/with someone else telling them. Finally after that, the same person posted a 10 rating, which was also unfair, and just mentioned the word "Foos"
I do not know if this review was deleted or not, but im not saying who did it, i want to torment you by looking. Anyways, its just that some people have no clue how to rate. Its sad, really. Oh, and please stop insulting Moonblaze, since he had nothing to do with this. (yes that was an insult to mb, if you look at it closer etc.)
No need for a whole thread about this, but its nice to have a thread where you can report unfair ratings.
Also, i feel sorry for the admins and mods, spending ruthless hours deleting these reviews. They should get an award or something.

Newspaz
Jan 18, 2003, 02:37 PM
If you just would have PMed me, I could just have changed it. I'm doing so now anyway.

Trafton
Jan 18, 2003, 02:42 PM
Just PM an administrator (Newspaz, Bobby, EvilMike, etcetera) if you get a rating that is way below what is feasable. No topic posting required. :)

Blackraptor
Jan 18, 2003, 02:44 PM
You people are only complaining about underratings. So does that mean if someone uploads a crappy level which is rated a 10 by a n00b who is related to the guy? If you say so...

BlazinDragon
Jan 18, 2003, 03:03 PM
thx NS =\

Tubz
Jan 18, 2003, 03:29 PM
Evilmike,Terminator,bobby for original lvl, Epic for making tileset Cell for conversion. Me for making the recreation.

I have to admit this is all the evidence I need. I'm afraid I have to defend NinjaUR. This is what you said, in your authors comment. Notice the 3 people who made a level. This is nothing but a rip.

You can't just post levels on the site that you didn't make, but edited. Don't post stuff like that on J2O, post your own "original" stuff.

Chipmunk
Jan 18, 2003, 03:32 PM
Absoloutely, it needs to be 100% all your except for the tilesets, or unless its a pack made by multiple people, like Project:Rabbit Force. edit: "others gave it a 7-8" oh that just means we all should everybody! lets all rate it!

BlazinDragon
Jan 18, 2003, 05:54 PM
This lvl was originally Evilmikes. I just got the level and recreated it in the tileset: j1battleships. NOTE: I ONLY TAKE CREDIT FOR RECREATING IT. EVILMIKE DID THE ORIGINAL LEVEL. Rate this lvl on how i recreated it.

Look, i just recreated the lvl, i never said u to rate it on how i ripped it. I just thought i wanted to have a little bit of fun and see how much of evilmike's lvl i could create. It then turned really great and i hosted it, beta tested it, and it was good enuff to post on J2O. I never ment to rip it, i just thought it looked cool and Evilmike and the others would like a neato new teambattle lvl

Btw the freak Ninjaur added his frekin 3.2 review..AGAIN!!!! could u admins plz delete it -.- tanx =\

Newspaz
Jan 19, 2003, 01:45 AM
I think J2O's view on this is: "Rate the level". Not: "Rate the design". You'd have to ask Bobby or FQuist on a more detailed explanation on this though.

MoonBlazE
Jan 19, 2003, 01:53 AM
When making a remake Newspaz, it's absolutely about rate the design of the level, and rate lower if the athour screwed some things up from the old version to the new. Else you'd rate EvilMike's level, and not the remake itself.

Also, don't post threads like this, it's offending to ninjaur, after he just rated what he thought, and not thought anymore of it.
You'd might even hurt his/her feelings by post such a thread like this.

Newspaz
Jan 19, 2003, 03:49 AM
Originally posted by Moonblaze
When making a remake Newspaz, it's absolutely about rate the design of the level, and rate lower if the athour screwed some things up from the old version to the new. Else you'd rate EvilMike's level, and not the remake itself.

Also, don't post threads like this, it's offending to ninjaur, after he just rated what he thought, and not thought anymore of it.
You'd might even hurt his/her feelings by post such a thread like this.

I'll make it clear: A remake is still a level. So rate the level. I could also go tell NinjaUR to go rate CelL's mini DW a 4 because it's not original. Though it's still a good level.

And yes, I also wonder why a moderator hasn't closed this yet.

BlazinDragon
Jan 19, 2003, 04:22 AM
amazing isnt it? ;)

This must be a record for a thread to be open this long! ;)