I'm telling you. It's Mr. Crow's fault. Mr. Crow is behind this HILARIOUS MESS. ;-P

----

Perhaps you'll pardon me if I write this letter in a more personal vein than usual. I want to tell you about some personal perceptions of mine, primarily because Mr. Crow is possessed by the devil. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. I am being completely serious when I say that his zingers cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that antidisestablishmentarianism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions.

I use such language purposefully -- and somewhat sardonically -- to illustrate how he does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, Mr. Crow discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. The essential point, however, is the following: All the deals he makes are strictly one-way. Mr. Crow gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. We all need to be aware of each other's existence as intelligent, feeling, human beings, even if some of us are surly saboteurs. He can't possibly believe that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom. He's stupid, but he's not that stupid.

Even when the facts don't fit, Mr. Crow sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. Again, his attempts to open the gates of hell are much worse than mere exhibitionism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. But I digress. I must ask that Mr. Crow's janissaries anneal discourse with honesty, clear thinking, and a sense of moral good. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to force us to tailor our actions just to suit his neo-duplicitous whims.

Maybe it's just me, but don't you think that Mr. Crow bickers and argues over petty things? While perhaps offensive to some readers, only a direct quote can fully convey the ill-bred, cuckoo nature and content of his scribblings: "Attention, helpers! Your orders are to exploit the feelings of charity and guilt that many people have over the plight of the homeless, and to do so at any cost." Every time he utters or writes a statement that supports parasitism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that his undertakings won't be used for political retribution. I surely claim we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because there is an open consensus that by excluding any possibility of comparison, he can easily pass off his own values as works of genius, but primarily because once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that we could opt to sit back and let Mr. Crow influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly muddleheaded. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part. Mr. Crow's satraps are brainwashed automatons programmed to spout line after line of pro-Mr. Crow propaganda. Although others may disagree with that claim, few would dispute that Mr. Crow and his apparatchiks are unscrupulous flakes. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis.

One might conclude that he has no ground and no right to reduce social and cultural awareness to a dictated set of guidelines to follow. Alternatively, one might conclude that it has been, and is, my great undertaking to get him off our back. In either case, I am reminded of the quote, "There is no question that we are becoming a nation of insufferable profiteers." This comment is not as bestial as it seems, because I wonder if Mr. Crow really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that I would indisputably like to comment on Mr. Crow's attempt to associate Fabianism with unilateralism. There is no association. There are situations where certain politics are appropriate and there are situations where they are not. Let me end by appealing to our collective sense of humanity: Mr. Crow's forces assume that because they look a certain way or come from a certain background, they have an inalienable right to authorize, promote, celebrate, and legitimize loathsome mandarinism.


Sincerely,

ANONYMOUS