What I offer here is an involved yet detached look at Coconut's offhand remarks. Perhaps time, further study, and more reflection will either modify or enrich the analysis offered here, but mankind, with all of its accumulated knowledge, wonderful machines, scientific methods, and material power, still has much to fear from bumptious, crass ratbags like Coconut. So let's begin, quite properly, with a brief look at the historical development of the problem, of its attempted solutions, and of the eternal argument about it. He can't see beyond his own sadistic, crazy concerns, by which I mean that his victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Coconut's flunkies, who loudly proclaim that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. Regardless of those parasitic proclamations, the truth is that he is a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath. The salient point here is that this is a transparent attempt to turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals. We can therefore extrapolate that Coconut is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of spiteful speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations -- and that's just the short list!

Call me old-fashioned, but I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of his hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. Coconut has been trying for some time to convince people that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. Don't believe his hype! Coconut has just been offering that line as a means to create problems that our grandchildren will have to live with. Imagine getting a dollar every time he said he wouldn't descend to character assassination and name calling, but did so anyway. You'd be very, very rich. Daily, the truth is being impressed upon us that every time he tells his yes-men that he should utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to quote me out of context because "it's the right thing to do", their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a surprise that Coconut's pronouncements are not only bad for the immortal soul, but for mortal men and women. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms. I am referring, of course, to the likes of Coconut.

Hi.