It's an interesting idea, but it raises several problems. The first of which would be what should be considered an unfair rating. Some cases, such as rating a level 1.0 that previously had a rating of 9.0, are plainly not reliable reviews. However, there are blurrings in the line, such as the SXR incident you pointed out. Some may consider SXR to be a 5.0 level pack. I'm not sure how, but some people have different ideals for levels. What the rule up until now seems to have been is if the review does not provide ample information on why the rating was given, it is not a good enough review. However, if the review does in fact provide sufficient reason to rate the level as such, then I suppose the review deserves to stay. Administrators do watch the downloads section, and remove unfair reviews. However, there are so many reviews, and it is hard to see when new reviews are posted, so not every single review can be checked and critiqued. Still, I agree that it would be nice to see increased administrating in the J2O downloads section. I think that this could be improved with a "Report this Review to a Moderator" function, which will probably be in J2O v2. And, until then, if you think a review to be unfair, I suppose you have to wait until you can report it to an administrator. I can't see many other solutions now to that problem.