For your argument about Freelance using swear words "creatively" he didn't seem to use one at all, since he used the expression "(censored)" in his post. A person censors whatever they think is wrong, so there can't be any argument against what Freelance had done, logically. For example, I might not be so bright and consider word articles to be objectionable. Instead of "a's", "an's" and "the's", I'd replace then with "(censored)" because I find it objectionable. This may seem to be a silly way to think about it, but no inner implications were involved, while the rest of the sentence would do so. This is the only way a higher authority's decision would swing either way, and it wouldn't be an easy one. I'd only monitor more closely, but give no material warning. The rest of the arguments are so obvious that I don't care to clear them up.