Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blackraptor
There also may be people who will purposely lower the reviewer's stats (for instance, pretend Violet reviewed someone's level, a sucky overrated level, and gave it a 4.5, while most of the other reviewers, presumably friends of the author of the level, gave it ratings like 7.5 or 8. The author of the level may get frustrated with Violets review because it brought down the rating that he/she will rate it a 1 for being bad. Even though Violet's is the most accurate review, it won't be rated as well because of the low rating it gave towards the level).
I probably confused everyone with this post, but oh well.
|
That is basically the same problem I said about it; also, having reviews-for-reviews just sounds weird. I suggested that perhaps there would be a way to give a one-line reason for the rating. The level maker and reviewer could not rate the review. Additionally, reviewer's ratings and reasons are logged for appropriateness. At the bottom, it will display a percent who found it helpful. This will also affect an average in the reviewer's profile, but not the rating. Perhaps an anonymous rating function would be available, that only administration can see the author of. Obviously, these ratings would go by the same rules as any other rating. Also, I suggest on a coding level that there is a control panel where you can see, dated, the latest reviews.
I also have a second suggestion: The date of when a review is posted should be displayed in the review. I'm surprised that no one (at least no one whom I can find) has suggested this previously.
Any suggestions?
~ Traft
Derby: Previous quotation edit.
Trafton: I had already removed the abused content in the quotation.
Last edited by Trafton; Nov 21, 2003 at 09:21 AM.
|