Erm, we had very good and working "guidelines" back then. It's just they weren't unfairly harsh like the new ones obviously are.

If someone writes
"Nothing to say Perfect Pack, nice lvls, nice tilesets, cool musics, you need to download...It's a exelent pack" and gives it a 10

the Violet guy simply removes the rating and puts a very stupid and inappropiate comment such as "WRONG. There is lots more to say. Rating removal. ~Violet" after it. That's very arrogant behaviour imho. The old guideline was, if someone rated a pack like Blade's with 1 while the pack had an average of 9,5 and wrote "this sucks" then the rating was removed by the admins.

You all know that i personally always wrote very long, very detailed and quite harsh reviews (average lenght: 704 characters, beat that), thats why i got a pretty good reputation at J2O if i remember right, but i can't accept these arrogant comments by the new admins, in this case Violet CLM.
As for me, i do not agree to these new kind of "guidelines" and i'm not sure if Fquist, Bobby, Iced, EvilMike, and Shadow, as the admins of old times, would agree to this.

P.S.:
mirrow, i dont get the point of your post.