Although FQuist already replied to this and basically said it all, I feel that I should say it for myself, as well. Sorry for the following sounding cheesy or mechanical, but I'm a bit preoccupied at the moment.

I really do not have much power. The main thing I do is enforce rules already in place and try, when I get a chance, to convey suggestions that have gained popularity on the JCF. I may have opinions, but I do my best not to introduce them into administrating.

I had nothing to do with Shadow getting "deadminned," even if I did disagree with him. Although I may do so, I would not ban him. It isn't my job to ban those who I disagree with. The very thing that supports any good democracy (or dictatorship, in this case) is differing opinions. Why should Shadow's opinions be held in less regard than mine? Why should I deadmin him just because I disagree with him? What sort of fun would there be in winning a disagreement by preventing someone from being in it? Even if I wanted to deadmin him or whatever, it is not my call. Bob and FQuist are the only ones who should do it, and my job is to enforce their rules, and nothing more.

Heck, I do not even know the reason for which Shadow was "deadminned," and really don't care. It has nothing to do with me and is honestly not my business.

~ Traft