As a reviewer, could you honestly tell me you'd give this sort of level a 4? You gave a 4.5 to CraccoBoy's Cracco Gathering Plus (Dec 2002), which you called "[bad]...[full of] ripped tiles," and you gave the same rating to Fantastic Bunny's In Lost Wood (Aug 2002), where you noted that the second level has "NO WAY OUT!" You even gave a 4.7 to hhf's Ice Cap Zone (Nov 2002), which you noted as "completely missing the important tiles" and having "not much good quality" and said it just plain "looks screwy."

Although I understand Battle1-bashing is cool, is two dead ends (if you're going to count the bottom left as one, you have to do the same to the bottom right - but really dead ends are not as bad in battle as they are in CTF at all), use of a copter (evil I agree), and a wayward vine (that's being a little touchy in my view) would be enough to rank it under a "screwy" MS Paint tileset?

I think that you're not being totally intellectually honest, as much as I also hate the overhostedness of Battle1. Also, I recall you rating it much higher in a previous topic like this one - what swayed your opinion so much?