Moonblaze, calm down and look at what you're posting. I posted one review of your tileset with a rating lower than you expected (which you've done to me in the past). You get mad, post a retort in the reviews area, and then post this thread demanding that people that people not review tilesets based on how well they're drawn? Whatever happened to friendly private messages?
Oh, and the Agama thing. I was only saying that practically everything in your set is in Agama's set, except Agama's set has other things as well. This is a reasonable comparison. It just doesn't make sense to make the same set over and over. You can make a basic nature tileset, but there's not much reason to actually use it in a level if it doesn't have some special features, as otherwise everything in it will be already done in Carrotus/Diamondus/Nature's Ruins/Mystic Forest/WHATEVER only with extra stuff. You want us to review on originality, and yes, that's what's going on.