Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Disguise
"Don't critic sets from the way they're drawn, but its mistakes."
This is wrong, with that sentence you are saying that you should completely ignore the amount of detail in the tileset and only rate it's usability. It takes effort to put detail into a tileset and make it look good, a lot of effort, don't ignore it. However, you shouldn't just rate a tileset based on it's detail alone, do look at the mistakes, do look at the usability, but don't forget to look at the detail aswell.
|
By that I meant, do not critic sets from the style they're drawn in, such as texurial, comic, realistic, ect. as your very very own personal prefence doesn't lower the possibilities with it, the theme, the details, everything. A good example is Mirrow's sets, they don't really fit Dean Dodrill's style, and so what? They're still excellent tilesets that contain a lot of originality, unique details, ect. You should be open to new styles, I've always wanted to do a style that made it look like Jazz was moving on a painting.
By the way, I <3 you Wisety.
^_____________________________________^
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disguise
*sings*
YOU AND ME BABY ARE NOTHING BUT MAMMALS LA LA LALAL LA LA ON THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL!!!
|
|