Joseph Collins has, I noticed, been giving an awful lot of bad ratings, which is all based on his personal opinion. Clearly, your opinions differ. To complicate mattes, I have decided to throw in my own opinions into the fray.

I think that the quality of music is proportional to the amount of time the author spent working on it. The quality can be increased, however, without adding extra time if the author happens to be especially brilliant at music-making. However, in the end, the listener of the music can't possibly give a 'Post reply' button to find out how much work the author has put in. The listener is obviously more interested in, well, listening and generally enjoying/hating the great/rubbish music. In other words, I don't think it's fair to give a low rating because the author has put little time in it. I think it's fair to only give a low rating because of the consequences (the consequence being that the music is crap) of the author's poor efforts.