I would normally be contacting via PM about this, but I think that this is a reasonable subject for public discussion. If any administrator disagrees, I would be happy to address the matter privately instead.

http://www.jazz2online.com/jcf/showt...178#post322178

I was under the apparent delusion that the JCF allowed discussion of sexual matters if not in a crude way. Is no mention of this word allowed whatsoever, as indicated? If so, why not? Past frank sexual discussion has been allowed, and I do not believe that my post was anywhere near out of bounds.

There was nothing wrong with my post relative to past discussion unless:

A. The topic at hand is banned, despite falling reasonably in the general sexuality discussion;
B. The post was edited because it quoted an already crude entry.

I don't really object to the edit, but the bounds seem ridiculously ambiguous. In this case, the word I mentioned was a word that average fifth grader does (or should, in an educated society) know. I did not use it in an offensive way, and it was the most respectful terms I could have phrased it in. I do not find "it used to be in the filter" a reasonable removal, since the reason it is/was filtered does not seem to fall into bounds of established rules.