I disagree with Derby for this final point. Here's part of what I said in my deleted post:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Link
This thread was neither originally intended as a general discussion of the editing of sexual content, nor a discussion about sexual content itself, but rather a contestation of a specific edit. In such a case, it does not make sense to prohibit explicit mention of the removed content.
|
Derby (and other administrators) can read the rest of the post if they want—I just didn't really want to start an argument in this thread.
__________________
With our extreme gelatinous apology,
We beg to inform your Imperial Majesty,
Unto whom be dominion and power and glory,
There still remains that strange precipitate
Which has the quality to resist
Our oldest and most trusted catalyst.
It is a substance we cannot cremate
By temperatures known to our Laboratory.
~ E.J. Pratt
|