Gah.

COOBA and RISP argue that the tiles should be taken out because they do not add anything to the tileset and aren't too usable. Nobody has attempted to argue with this.
OTHER PEOPLE are complaining that just because somebody drew something, it should be in the tileset even if it doesn't work.

Guess what? Maybe the tileset looks better without those tiles! Do you have any idea how much stuff Agama threw out of Egypt (I think it was)? Or how much concept stuff Disguise can do that doesn't end up being used? A tileset doesn't need to have everything anyone draws.
Here are three opinions of mine, which you can disagree with:

• "Let's Make A Tileset". Not "I want to see my tiles in a tileset". The goal of having a good tileset is more important than the goal of having every single tile anyone thinks might work included.
• The purpose of the voting system (with the 75% majority) is so if somebody draws something incredibly ugly, it can be removed easily. It was, at least on my end, expected that stuff that isn't incredibly ugly but just isn't quite appropriate could be removed without the need of the voting system, because the creators would be mature enough to accept the fact their tiles weren't needed. You will notice we do not have all of the attempts to make the ground tileable, and that was without voting.
• That said, Cooba did kind of abuse the voting system. I would suggest, from a position of no power, to ignore that and in clear languahe institute another vote against those tiles, wherein people would be requested to make logical statements defending the tiles if they want to include them.