apsadfspadksdsafasd
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stijn
Cooba, I don't like how you turned LMAT into some "let's have a voting for every tile I don't like" thing.
|
I don't like how you assume that the possibility for voting against groups of tiles was my idea. A majority of the new LMAT rules were Violet's ideas, all I did was posting the thread.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerrythabest
But.. theres a voting for 2 days and since it seems everyone is against the removal of them, you loose.  |
By saying "I will delete them again" I meant "I will cast another vote against them". And as a few posts latter to yours show, not everyone is against deletion of the tiles.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ShadowRabbit
1. It's "people contributing to the tileset and seeing their creation in glory", not if it's good keep it and if it's bad burn it say "Z0/\/\G T|-|0Z3 T1|_3Z |_000K 134D (|-|U(K D3/\/\ 00T (4UZ3 1 Z41D $0 L0LZ U $UK !1!111!!!!1!one".
|
If it's bad, call them bad and start a vote*. By the way, your l33t sucks.
Quote:
|
Clearly. 2 votes out of 2 is 100% and it has to be 75%
|
I find it rather obvious that the majority needs to be 75% or more than 75%, so I don't get what your point is.
That said, I agree with what Violet said. I did abuse a leak in the rule, and thus the voting should be reinstated, this time being clearly specified that it's actually a voting. And when voting, one should specify his/her argument over deleting/keeping the tiles.
|