Thanks for clarifying that Gry. Let me reply to Yasco's post now.

In CC's organisation, Leaders and CoLeaders can always outrank DivisionLeaders and GameLeaders (as is probably the case in most clans). In other words, the Leader & CoLeader can veto a DivisionLeader's or GameLeader's decision.

And as Gry (who you do believe) says, I didrefuse several times. These logs are from the 25th of December:

[22:34:06] Johan // Grt: Ill aim for the compromise
[22:34:15] Johan // Grt: this round is real and we will get round
based scoring
[22:34:20] Tom // Chiyu: no way :S

and a while later:

[22:36:44] Johan // Grt: well
[22:36:50] Johan // Grt: I siad round based scoring as the deal
[22:36:50] Tom // Chiyu: I refuse

and later again:

[22:39:43] Johan // Grt: Well, as I tell you
[22:39:46] Johan // Grt: we have 2 options
[22:39:52] Tom // Chiyu: we haven't got any options at all
[22:40:06] Tom // Chiyu: we just stick to the normal procedure and
dont make any compromises with (-) yasco >_>
[22:40:26] Johan // Grt: 1) let them count this round as real, with
summed scoring (BAD)
2) let them coutn this round as real, with round bases
scoring (drastically increasing our winning chances)
[22:40:37] Tom // Chiyu: why would you want to change to round based
scoring?
[22:40:42] Tom // Chiyu: it's better if we take normal scoring
[22:40:56] Tom // Chiyu: less risky

I even asked Gry if he could pass that on to 8'D and just let them blame me instead of him (=Gry) for the fact that CC' will not accept round based scoring, but Yasco's reaction implies that he was unaware of this.

So whether people agree with me that it should be counted by scores or not, there is one point that cannot be questioned: I have been consistent from the beginning till the end and have never agreed on round based scoring, not before the clanwar, not after. So the claim made by *some* people that I (or CC) changed it's mind after the clanwar in order to turn a defeat into a victory is completely false.