Quote:
Originally Posted by R3ptile
first of all most JJ2 players are not kids. secondly this ladder will indeed be a ladder and it would work almost the same way. there is a small difference that in WC3 a few people also play for money. jj2's population might be smaller but this has its own advantages as well. i still think you could find at least five opponents in your level at any time. also, you seem to miss the whole purpose here. if we just wanted something to brag of, we could stick to JDC where it's way easier to win. you barely have anything to brag of when it comes to jj2, it's not like your girlfriend would be more proud of you if you would tell her that you beat Cracco Clan in a duel.
|
In my eyes, most of the players on JJ2 are kids or at least behave like it. That's only offensive if you find being called a kid one. You may be surprised how many people that share that vision.
As for how far the ladder goes, nowhere without the support. I think it's a good idea. Not everyone thinks the same. Only few is supporting you so far. Be more open minded in regards to critique and you might get it going.
What Shadow says about the ladder system comparison is true, we can't make matching system based on levels at all and chances of it filling more than 1 page of players aren't that big.
Also, a ladder without matching systems or prize money is the same as a permanent JCF scoreboard as we're not going to be able to edit the way players join an online game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by R3ptile
by the way, i don't think a WC3 player ranked 13th would consider a player ranked 1964th "good". that's the way it works in jj2 as well.
|
And in response to this, I do hope you realize climbing a ladder isn't just about being good it's also about how much time you have to play games.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disguise
*sings*
YOU AND ME BABY ARE NOTHING BUT MAMMALS LA LA LALAL LA LA ON THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL!!!
|
|