Quote:
Originally Posted by Fquist
I wish to add that Cooba's original post has been restored and is worth reading.
Cooba's post was deleted for another reason. As is apparant from Cooba's original, now restored, post, he did listen and react to criticism, even though he did belatedly.
|
I'm glad to see his original post was restored, since I can read it now. He actually raises a number of good points, and if that post wasn't deleted in the first place I probably wouldn't have even bothered to post in this thread.
It was silly for it to have been deleted in the first place, though. I think an important part of being an administrator is responding to threads or general situations like this in a mature way. Unfortunately, it's obvious from reading the later posts in this thread that this does not seem to be happening.
I stand by the point I made earlier in this thread, but I am also glad to see that cooba did respond to the criticisms in a positive way. Still, sarcastic, underhanded comments like "That's not a nice way to speak about Lark's and Frank's posts!" illustrate the fact that there is still a problem here with how cooba deals with constructive criticism.
|