It's a valid question, Lena. The majority of forums have 100*100. I appreciate that an avatar is allowed, but the fact that it is so restrictive kind of relegates its usefulness to a token move.
The only thing that 100*100 might affect is that double height could lengthen posts made without a signature.
How many people do you know that don't have a signature?
It seems very much like 48*48 is an arbitrary number plucked from the air without any experimentation with what's within the bounds of suitability.
And the 3kb file size is shockingly small. Most pics seem to have a minimum size of around 3kb regardless of image data - 10kb is much more reasonable if the aim is bandwidth limitation.
__________________
"Are we not threatened with a flood of information? And is this not the monstrousness of it: that it crushes beauty by means of beauty, and annihilates truth by means of truth? For the sound of a million Shakespeares would produce the very same furious din and hubbub as the sound of a herd of prairie buffalo or sea billows."
—Stanisław Lem, Imaginary Magnitude (1973)
|