Quote:
Originally Posted by Obi1mcd
That last sentence of yours pretty much sums up what I meant to say. Sorry if I wasn't all that clear.
|
My mistake btw, I sometimes come across as if I'm not listening, I appreciate your point of view too, I just wanna get mine across. =P
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grytolle
JCSC! xd
I'm willing, but imo you could include level makers from the groups among the judges, as long as its balanced (because I understand if its hard to find enough non-level makers).
JJB comes to mind, being the tactical genious of t3
I've heard rumours that Treylina is an intelligent player
Vegito has the same kind of experience as me, but is less outspoken in his opinions (on the other hand he actually knows how to use JCS)
I've got half a mind to suggest Slayer, because he seems to have a genuine interest in new levels and his taste isn't half as bad as his... personality.
I'm sure more players could be found with some advertising...
(Obviously I don't know if any of those players are active in a level making group... )
|
Does anyone think they're suited to do the job then? I've spoken to some and they've expressed interest. Speak up if you want to, and include why you're suitable, else I think this is gonna turn into a group voting (possibly includng people from levelgroups too) rather than a small panel of judges. Not that it's a bad thing, I suppose, a group of different opinions is probably a better way to voice which levels are better anyway, and with the right focus, we could get the balance between EC and gameplay etc. down.
|