Nitro: Denied. It simply doesn't make sense to ban people over that kind of stuff.

Thanks for the suggestion tough.

Link:
Some people had complaints about that kind of stuff because it isn't really democratic as much as the original system, ie: everyone gets as much a voice.

Personally I would think it is a great system.

You get some problems tough:

Person A started with one line sucky reviews.
He improves. But as he has so much sucky one-liners his average rating barely improves.. So, what does he do? Delete his all his old reviews. But I'd say, better a one-liner then no review at all.

Another problem is:

WizkidABCD and MikeyABCD are both in the same clan.. they rate eachother's review 10.

So, reviews must better be reviewed a lot, to not give a twisted vision of the truth. And if levels get reviewed too little, how often are reviews going to be rated?

Yet another problem, but easy to solve is.. won't level authors give good reviews great ratings?
Easy to get around this, but with multiple accounts..

Maybe, this is just a proposal, we could have a system like Amazon:

5 of 9 people found this review usefull.. it would probably be less of a hassle, but less strict too.