These ideas are all interesting but I personally doubt the feasibility of nearly all of them with the possible exception of JCS+.
Quote:
|
robust internal structure and recode certain parts of jj2 like the engine itself
|
I personally don't see how we can actually expect to produce a spot on replication of the JJ2 engine itself when all we have is the binary. I can easily think of a number of subtle issues that would be extremely time consuming to reverse engineer (for example, how do bouncers actually bounce? The server is responsible for this calculation.). It might be possible to get a JJ2 engine that is 90% of the way to being accurate but I don't think we'd ever be able to get that last 10% perfect.
|