Quote:
Originally Posted by Speeza
Another flaw about reputation is not everyone is going to look at a thread , perhaps because it just doesn't interest them. Someone who just cracks a funny joke could get more rep than say someone who helps a person getting there JJ2 working. I think the person who helped the guy trying to get his JJ2 to work deserves more rep than the guy who crack a joke. Sadly however you can't allocate how much rep someone deserves. Some of these people who have high reputation for example, I look at some of there posts and I'm wondering "How on earth did these guys get so much rep, compared to some others with lower rep and have done a lot more helpful things.
|
I slightly agree with this. Im at 47 for a couple of jokey, some even meanspirited posts, meanwhile mothersnuckin Blackraptor is at 14. This guy contributes great discussion to the forums. Whats the deal? Seriously.
Like its a good thing that number doesn't mean anything because the implications of that is effed up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dermo
And what would be funny is if you got below 50 rep, you were unable to post unless your post was viewed by a mod/admin first. That would be a real form of quality control, however, and I'm not so sure as to whether I'm opposed to that idea or not.
|
That would be funny because that would mean no one but like Cooba, Stijn, and Unknown Rabbit could post freely. And I think that illustrates why rep shouldn't have any serious consequence/reward added to it.
Last edited by n00b; Sep 9, 2010 at 02:51 PM.
Reason: added a word i forgot
|