Quote:
Originally Posted by Speeza
Another flaw about reputation is not everyone is going to look at a thread , perhaps because it just doesn't interest them. Someone who just cracks a funny joke could get more rep than say someone who helps a person getting there JJ2 working. I think the person who helped the guy trying to get his JJ2 to work deserves more rep than the guy who crack a joke. Sadly however you can't allocate how much rep someone deserves. Some of these people who have high reputation for example, I look at some of there posts and I'm wondering "How on earth did these guys get so much rep, compared to some others with lower rep and have done a lot more helpful things.
|
In Unknown Rabbit's case, I must say this statement contradicts itself, unfortunately.
Though I'm not completely opposed to reputation, Speeza does bring up some valid points. However, I feel as if it is as fair of a system as it could get. What more could be done without regulating reputation? He's dead-on when he said this should've been done years ago.
And what would be funny is if you got below 50 rep, you were unable to post unless your post was viewed by a mod/admin first. That would be a real form of quality control, however, and I'm not so sure as to whether I'm opposed to that idea or not.
__________________
Yes, I am, in fact, ALWAYS the one to blame for everything. And none of your are full of yourself. Good job.
Do you like Stijn? Take my poll!
Windows is not a virus. A virus is small and efficient...
Note to Stijn: how am i even getting away with this
|