View Single Post
LittleFreak LittleFreak's Avatar

JCF Member

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 4,190

LittleFreak is doing well so far

Apr 20, 2006, 01:10 AM
LittleFreak is offline
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
Handling 800x600 or 1024x768 isn't really as hard as you make it sound.
You say. The computer I play with has about 1400 MB, which is average in the world of today with 3600 computers (or even higher, I don't know), but very high for a game like JJ2 which can run on 100 MB PCs. And come to think of it, it can't handle full screen windowed mode.

Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
This is the dream of many players.
It's the dream of many guys to be able to hypnotise any girl they want to so they get as much sex as they can get. Is it a good thing just because it's their dream?

Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
I just can't resist finding out how Jazz works with a higher resolution.
It is an interesting thought, yes, but that still doesn't prove any good argument to support the patch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
It would improve, or change the gameplay.
It would certainly change it, yes. But if the gameplay was really improved is the question. I doubt it, for the reasons several people stated already.

Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
I could finally see something in windowed mode.
I can see fine in windowed mode. I don't know about you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
When playing in a server with many players, the player list would take a lot less space.
True, but unneccessary. Just deactivate the list with F9 if it bugs you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
Playing in splitscreen mode would be much easier.
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
With this patch, or whatever you would want to call it, we'd be able to play new, much bigger maps.
How so? Just the sight gets increased, not the level width.

Quote:
Originally Posted by R3p
I can't really see why people would resist using it.
Well, not everyone's mind functions like yours I guess.
__________________
Sober again. Still love it.