Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   JazzJackrabbit Community Forums » Maintenance & Feedback » Site and Forum Rules, Questions & Feedback

Encouraging reviews.

Fquist_old

JCF Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 863

Fquist_old is doing well so far

Jul 10, 2001, 05:24 AM
Fquist_old is offline
Reply With Quote
J2o lacks reviews.. so I am wondering, would giving awards for good reviewers or loyal reviewers be a good idea? What kind of prize?



Some people really spend quite some effort at ruxor reviews. I want to award that.
EvilMike

JCF Member

Joined: Jun 2001

Posts: 3,478

EvilMike is OFF DA CHARTEvilMike is OFF DA CHARTEvilMike is OFF DA CHARTEvilMike is OFF DA CHART

Jul 10, 2001, 10:11 AM
EvilMike is offline
Reply With Quote
Didn't J2O used to have "official reviewers"? Maybie you could award that status to good reviewers.
__________________
Download my JJ2 Episodes! (5 episodes)

Visit My JJ2 Blog (HOLD YOUR HORSES I'M WORKING ON IT SHEESH)
Rumbo Rabbit

JCF Member

Joined: May 2001

Posts: 201

Rumbo Rabbit is doing well so far

Jul 18, 2001, 07:41 AM
Rumbo Rabbit is offline
Reply With Quote
Yeah thats a good idea. We should have a selective group of reviewers for the stories in the war tavern and such. Also we should give rewards to war tavern story tellers as they deserve some credit (Im not just saying that as I am one of them )



Rumbo
__________________
'With his father dead and his life as confusing as TIME itself, he stood independantly with his blaster and sword by his side. He was going to save the world, no doubt about it...'
Newspaz

JCF Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 2,678

Newspaz has disabled reputation

Jul 18, 2001, 11:51 AM
Newspaz is offline
Reply With Quote
How about this. People visit the War Tavern a little less and start reviewing?
Fquist_old

JCF Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 863

Fquist_old is doing well so far

Jul 18, 2001, 12:54 PM
Fquist_old is offline
Reply With Quote
Evilmike: in my experience that doesn't really encourage
Violet CLM

JCF Éminence Grise

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 11,090

Violet CLM has disabled reputation

Jul 18, 2001, 02:15 PM
Violet CLM is offline
Reply With Quote
I'm not a good reviewer. I've reviewed 3 uploads! What do you expect of me?!?
Aiko

JCF Member

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 568

Aiko is doing well so far

Aug 3, 2001, 01:22 PM
Aiko is offline
Reply With Quote
I like the idea because i also wrote some reviews.
Fquist_old

JCF Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 863

Fquist_old is doing well so far

Aug 5, 2001, 12:50 PM
Fquist_old is offline
Reply With Quote
Last time you didn't want the status.
Hareoic

JCF Member

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 2,578

Hareoic is doing well so far

Aug 5, 2001, 02:02 PM
Hareoic is offline
Reply With Quote
Rating: 8.95/10

I think the reason this thing isn't good is because there aren't enough smileys and you have to wait too long for somebody to continue something in the War Tavern as well as you don't get any rankings. If this place was somewhat more like BB (EXCEPT for spamming), then I'd give it a 10.
__________________
But perhaps the most likely reason of all,
was that his bombs were simply two sizes too small
SteelTalon

JCF Member

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 661

SteelTalon is doing well so far

Aug 11, 2001, 07:35 PM
SteelTalon is offline
Reply With Quote
Yeah, perks would be cool. Personnally I'd review more if there were also other reviewers reviewing (otherwise it kind've defeats the point), we got to have (small) images under our name, and got to have custom statuses and nifty stuff like that. Perhaps other bonuses like being able to give "brownie points" that add up and show up on the front page where it shows all the levels (or maybe even a script were all of the "advanced reviewers'" ratings were averaged and put alongside the real rating).
__________________
-SteelTalon, Black Wolf
<font size="-2">
the ELM tree
PreSenT PaST
</font>
Fquist_old

JCF Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 863

Fquist_old is doing well so far

Aug 12, 2001, 03:53 AM
Fquist_old is offline
Reply With Quote
Some good ideas.



What do you mean by brownie points?



Does anyone want a karma system for j2o?
Ice M A N

JCF Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 580

Ice M A N is doing well so far

Aug 12, 2001, 05:21 AM
Ice M A N is offline
Reply With Quote
Karma system? Sorta like the way slashdot does it? Hmm.. that'd be interesting..



I'd probably write a few reviews then..
Newspaz

JCF Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 2,678

Newspaz has disabled reputation

Aug 12, 2001, 10:14 AM
Newspaz is offline
Reply With Quote
Karma?
Monolith

JCF Member

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 2,221

Monolith is doing well so far

Aug 12, 2001, 01:44 PM
Monolith is offline
Reply With Quote
It's where you vote on people or their write-ups, and that person gains/looses karma accordingly. (I think that's what he's thinking of..)

That might be interesting, but it won't make me personally write more reviews since I usually don't download the levels in the first place.
SteelTalon

JCF Member

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 661

SteelTalon is doing well so far

Aug 14, 2001, 11:04 AM
SteelTalon is offline
Reply With Quote
Well, what I meant by brownie points was that in addition to your rating you could give a certain amount of points that just got added up and showed up by the rating (only by advanced users). Example (dates etc. are omitted):



Name of Level | Rating | Brownie Points

Example010101 | 8.6834 | 56



I then thought of a better idea - Advanced Ratings. It'd be another column where simply all "Advanced Raters" ratings were averaged. They'd go a little like this:



Name of Level | Rating | Advanced Rating

Example010101 | 8.6834 | 7.4



Now I have yet another idea that goes by the name of "Weight". The more reviews etc. a reviewer has the more "weight" they get. For instance, if both I and a newbie rated a level, it wouldn't be the exact average. It would be closer to my rating since I had more "weight". The only problem with implementing this would be fiddling around with mathematical equations to get the "weight" down right and dealing with members with different "weight" totals. Perhaps the weight would have to be preportional and would be calculated for each rating, maybe through a ranking of all the users.



The system that this would be based off of is still up to speculation, though. Whether it is based off of number of reviews or karma seems to be the issue as those are the only plausible alternatives to rank people by. My vote would be towards karma, as it is detailed in the upcoming thoughts.



I think karma should work identically to a level being reviewed, except obviously it is about a person. Perhaps people could have a "Karma Rating" right next to their name or under it.



Monolith: It sounds like we just need more levels in quality and quantity. ;P



Another general idea for improvement on J20 is for all of the tenths in each number be selectable. Possibly you could pick them in different columns - you pick your initial number and then you have another column listing the tenths in which the script adds each other together to get the level rating.



Also I would like to see level ratings displayed to the hundreths (maybe even thousandths, but anything past hundreths seems pretty ridiculous) visibly in the download area and everywhere else.



Hehe, once a long rater always a long rater - my rants are always long whether they're on levels or not, like now.
__________________
-SteelTalon, Black Wolf
<font size="-2">
the ELM tree
PreSenT PaST
</font>
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:21 AM.