It is so irresistably cute! ^^

It probably is, but can you please post a picture of it.

Originally Posted by Marine1969

It probably is, but can you please post a picture of it.

Have you considered watching this site with a browser supporting image files like that sprite?

Fiiiixed. Sorry.

Heh, it looks just like one of those sprites in a Pokémon (Advance) game. Nice work.

HAX! SHE HAS 4 ARMS AND NO VISIBLE CLEAVAGE!

What sers^^ said.

Her dress could use another brighter shade. It looks flat right now.

Well it is kinda cute.

Cute! =D

Nice. Perhaps the eyes could be changed in a way to even improve cuteness. And, well, what Unknown said, except in a less harsh tone.

This one sprite had three times as many replies as my art gallery : (

Originally Posted by Marine1969

This one sprite had three times as many replies as my art gallery : (

I feel snubbed all the time when I want replies for my art...

And then there's the jackasses that haven't even drawn anything yet and just create a topic to talk about what they want to draw... and those get a ton of replies... it's retarded, really...

Now I feel slightly worse.

Why?

It's a sad fact, but these "sprite" artists steal all the attention on this forum...
I mean... sprites are fine... but a whole thread on one sprite? Come on people... start posting when you have more than one sprite to show off...

Quickly! Make more sprites so people will shut up!

I found a way to scan items on a normal paper scanner and posted pictures on my gallery, I was hoping for at least a little feedback.

Originally Posted by Hazel-rah

Why?

It's a sad fact, but these "sprite" artists steal all the attention on this forum...
I mean... sprites are fine... but a whole thread on one sprite? Come on people... start posting when you have more than one sprite to show off...

And you start posting when you have two pictures of the same character/whatever in different angles/poses.
I'm now going to give Marine Feedback.

Yay! Marine feedback!

If I hadn't jsut been throwing up for 30 minutes I'd be really happy.

Originally Posted by n00b

And you start posting when you have two pictures of the same character/whatever in different angles/poses.

They are *NOT* the same character. You don't put much work into 32x32 pictures... what was it.. 15 minutes for that Sonic sprite... ?

Marine and I put a lot of time into our work...

And har har Radium for making that pixel thread... you're hilarious...

Those complaining just need to face the fact that a lot of excellent art is going to be placed aside for something cute that people respond well to easily; the exception to this is if your work is way above par.

Que Passa!!!!

Pretty adorable!

Originally Posted by Hazel-rah

They are *NOT* the same character. You don't put much work into 32x32 pictures... what was it.. 15 minutes for that Sonic sprite... ?

Marine and I put a lot of time into our work...

And har har Radium for making that pixel thread... you're hilarious...

EDIT- I have no idea what the heck I was trying to prove, this is why you don't try to do something when you're half awake.
I'm thanking Batty buddy for reviving this because I would have otherwise not have seen this post.
19 minutes. It took me 19 minutes for that sprite. And because I'm insane, I decided to see what I would draw in that same ammount of time(19 minutes), if acting only on impulisive doodling, just to see if the end result of a 19 minute doodle was better than a 19 minute sprite.
http://www.maj.com/gallery/Lijik/giz...f/dsc01043.jpg
The link above takes you to a doodle featuring two munchkin-istic animals, whose leg's being short are primarily the fault of me doodling with a pen, some random planets, a spaceship just flying by, and two smaller creatures just standing around.(blame the lighting and size on my currently non-working scanner which forced me to use a digital camera)
Anyways in the end, a drawing that took 30 min-hour to draw beats a 19 minute sprite, but I'd rather see one sprite than a doodle drawn completely on impulses with many a mistake(I can point out more than a few on my doodle) that took the same time to make.

Originally Posted by Hazel-rah

They are *NOT* the same character. You don't put much work into 32x32 pictures... what was it.. 15 minutes for that Sonic sprite... ?

Marine and I put a lot of time into our work...

And har har Radium for making that pixel thread... you're hilarious...

Uhh, pardon me, but in pixel art, you worry about every single pixel, since a change in one pixel can mean a very different picture, depending on placement and the difference in color. In a 32x32 lineart, you have 1024 pixels to worry about. While pixel art may look small and easy, it really isn't. Shading (what is considered by many what makes the art, well, art) can be a really tough process.

LOL, this is cute

What Odin says.
Making good sprites is HARD.

Originally Posted by ?JSZ¿ JaZz!

It is so irresistably cute! ^^

What the heck is that?

It's a tiny Eva sprite. Hence the topic title.

Well than it's ugly! and why does everyone like it so much?

Originally Posted by NaT

Well than it's ugly! and why does everyone like it so much?

I rest my case.

I couldn't have put it a better way.

I'm not sure anyone could have, LittleFreak. *Puts arm around LF's shoulders*