In fact, it would more or less meaninglessly complicate things and maybe result in some problems, so me neither.

I don't think it's such a bad idea to have an optional Elimination round for the top 16 of the season after a season, like the "Champions League" of JDC. The first 16 qualify, and the winner is the "JDCE champion", while the winner of the regulary season still remains the winner of the regulary season. That'd add some nice action for the end of a season and certainly ensure some nice matchups of duels of top players. This would be additionally interesting for spectators. I'd highly approve of that, it's like a finale furioso for the season!

As an option, sure why not. But forcing an elimination is a no no

Forcing it is no. But as an option I would like it, yes.

In fact, that could work. I give it all my support.

The ultimate champion should be determined by the regular season, at least.
Maybe give some kind of extra honors to the elimination winner.

Indeed.

I would suggest no bonus points for the last round and only up to 5 points for events like 5v5.

I wish there will be a solution in the future for the problem between single-round events of different sizes. Today there were 6 people who played first a 3vs3, and a 6vs6 after that. However, because these are worth different amount of points, the ones who didn't play an event earlier had the chance to earn more event points than the ones who already played a smaller event. And for especially those who gained 0 points from the 3vs3, it feels rather unfair that they will be given nothing in the another event too.

Another problem is the timezones that might show the dates of events differently, thus it might confuse some officials to remove points from players that actually deserve their points, since the event was played only a few hours after the begin of the day.

let users submit 3v3 themselves

I suggest removing 3vs3's and 4vs4's altogether

I think 7v7 should be 10 points. Any less = 5 =[

Originally Posted by cooba

I suggest removing 3vs3's and 4vs4's altogether

3v3 is my favorate

Coob and Rag can burn in hell if you ask me.

Originally Posted by St. Louis

Coob and Rag can burn in hell if you ask me.

Anything constructive please?

So far Gry's suggestion feels like the best for me at least. 3vs3 could work the same way like 2vs2 does.

Originally Posted by St. Louis

Coob and Rag can burn in hell if you ask me.

A very responsible and insightful reply from an official there. You're doing your job at your best

*Begins burning in hell*... Hm Diablo is hard to kill when ur noob

Really, let users submit 3v3's. 3v3's teams are orginized and requires teamplay and skills unlike events where it is madness (sparta), and therefore differ from them. And more fun.

Originally Posted by cooba

A very responsible and insightful reply from an official there. You're doing your job at your best

This thread isn't associated with that 'job'.
Also, following posts 51 and/or 52 would make JDC boring.