Letâs change the entryâs title to âAlliancesâ instead. ~White Rabbit.
But itâs like naming the âClanâ entry âClanmatesâ. ;-P The clan entry is about clans, not clanmembers, and the âAllyâ entry is about alliances, not alliesâŠallies of who? Clan Alliances would also be a suitable name. ~White Rabbit.
No, it would be like naming the âclanâ entry âclubsâ. While clubs is the correct word for groups of people that do stuff together clans is the term thatâs used in the jj2 community (and in any gaming community for that matter).~
Fl@$h aka BlewMeUp
But âclubâ and âclanâ are synonyms while âclanâ and âclanmateâ are not. Allies are part of an alliance â the name should belong in the table of contents, along with âEnemiesâ. Since âAlliancesâ is a broader term and has to do with everything related to alliances, and âAlliesâ is too specific, âAlliancesâ is a better choice. I also disagree with the assumption that the JJ2 term is âalliesâ. Some clans just prefer to say âwe became allies with the
XXX clanâ instead of âwe made an alliance with the
XXX clanâ.
http://8d.ncmv.net/, for example, uses âallianceâ while the now-defunct
CKA uses âalliesâ, but only because it is a more apporpriate term for defining its stance towards other clans, and it does not not use âalliancesâ either. ~White Rabbit.
The term ally, in this case, means a clan that is an ally of another clan, in plural form. Iâd say thatâs an appropriate title for the entry. And I have never seen any clan use âallianceâ except for the aforementioned 8D.
Iâd also like some input on this from others :P ~
Fl@$h aka BlewMeUp
But the entry is already about alliances, not allies. There are definitions of alliances between clans, examples of alliances, the definition of the opposite of alliances and a short history of alliances in the community. Iâve already brought up the question âallies of who?â If an entry specifically about allies and their relations with each other was originally desired, then you havenât really written about the right things. ~WR
As far as I know, the
clans entry isnât about Scottish barbarous tribes either. How hard is it to understand that this entry describes the
common JJ2 concept of allies, not the allies as in the linguistic meaning of it? ~
Fl@$h aka BlewMeUp
What about having the title be alliances, which is a broader concept than allies, where allies are clans in an alliance (just like members are part of a clan), and then having an
allies entry which contains text like âAllies are clans which are in an
allianceâ or something of that sort. It seems to me that comparing how common usage is of the words allies vs. alliance is less efficient here than realising what concept â allies or alliances â describes the subject matter more precisely and is the broader term. It seems more senseful to describe what a clan alliance is and less senseful to describe what an ally is. An ally in itself is nothing, itâs a name for someone who is in an alliance. ~
Fquist