Jazz Jackrabbit 2 Online

TILESET/TILESET USE: The author uses Diamondus, but there is no background eyecandy. However, most of the tiles seem to fit together, and there is nothing horribly bad or something like that.
Pros: Fits together decently.
Cons: Doesn’t manage to look good.
Rating: 4.5

WEAPON/ITEM PLACEMENT: No. Just.. no. There’s an easily accessible (go into the warp next to the start) bubble shield, and the warp on the right will give you some seeker ammo, or seeker/blaster powerups.
Pros: No.
Cons: Yes.
Rating: 1.0

ORIGINALITY: There is little that is original about this level. The easily accessible bubble shield has been done before, only better.
Pros: Umm.. the warps between leafs was kind of original.
Cons: Yes.
Rating: 1.5

GAMEPLAY/DESIGN: The design is a flat surface with warps to goodies on either end. The gameplay is getting the bubble shield, finding someone who doesn’t have it, then trying to roast them while they desperately attack you with their powered up seeker and/or blaster.
Pros: No.
Cons: The good stuff is way too accessible, the level is way too flat.
Rating: 1.2

REPLAY VALUE/FUN FACTOR: Just.. no. No.
Pros: Still no.
Cons: There is very little fun to be had from this sort of gameplay.
Rating: 1.0

OVERALL (not an average): There is CHEESE ahead! Unless you’re going left. Anyway, this is a flat level with too much power for the players, not enough alternate routes, etc. It’s also rather Jazz-biased.
Pros: Some interesting things, showing that the author’s talent may mature.
Cons: No eyecandy to speak of, poor design, doesn’t look fun to play.
Rating: 1.5

Just in case you plan to, please do not post a review *censored*ing me to suffer in torment forever, writing long reviews with a computer that crashes just as they are almost done. I rate levels on their merits, and not depending on who the author is. CelL could have uploaded this and gotten the same basic review, with a few exclamations of surprise added on.

I can not say that I quite as much like this level as Violet, even. Don’t feel discouraged that your first level is not very good, though – first levels are rarely good. Keep making levels, but spend more time on them next time.

TILESET/TILESET USE: Diamondus is used. There are no major tile errors or anything, but the level still does not look very good at all. The entire thing is quite bland and there is no background eyecandy. I have to disagree with Violet about the score here – I can not say that I like the eyecandy at all.
Pros: Does not look awfully buggy.
Cons: Looks poor, regardless.
Rating: 3.5

WEAPON/ITEM PLACEMENT: Shields, some basic ammo and powerups accessable by warps. That pretty much sums up the weapon placement in this level. Low-quality and not well-done.
Pros: The basic ammo placement was OK, sort of.
Cons: Easy shield.
Rating: 1.2

ORIGINALITY: No.
Rating: N/A

GAMEPLAY/DESIGN: The entire level consists of one flat surface with a few warps coming out from it to other areas. Most of the game, of course, will be played on the flat surface. There is not anything enjoyable about this level to speak of. A lot of stuff is destruct scenery, which is fun to shoot, but that wears off quickly and the level becomes boring.
Pros: No.
Cons: Yes.
Rating: 1.2

REPLAY VALUE/FUN FACTOR: Unless you have the amazing ability to entertain yourself with destruct sceneries for long periods of time, replay is probably going to be torturous..
Pros: Destruct sceneries might interest some people.
Cons: …Maybe four people.
Rating: 1.0

OVERALL (not an average): Despite the destruct scenery and occasional semi-entertaining text signs, this level is fairly poor. Do not be discouraged by your first level getting a low rating, as it does not mean future levels will necessarily also get low ratings. Spend more time on your levels next time and you’ll probably get higher ratings. This does show some promise, mainly in the realm of eyecandy, but I can not recommend this for download in its current state.
Pros: Not bad for a first level.
Cons: Not all that great either.
Rating: 1.5

GAMEPLAY: F
Flow: D -
Layout: F
Creativity: F
Bugs: D -

EYECANDY: D
Tileset use: D -
Eyecandy look: F
Creativity: F
Bugs: C

PLACEMENT: F
Weapons: F

THE FINAL GRADE: D – (rating below adjusted due to blandness)

THE FINAL RATING: 1.5

+ PROS: Promising for a first level.
- CONS: Not all that great. Needs some work. But keep working on levels – this definitely shows promise.

- Trafton

A rather bad level… but it’s the first try, so…

Tileset use: not too good. I saw many bugs and parts that don’t fit together.

Layout: boring. mostly just a straight path with a few warps.

Events: not much weaponnery, a few warps, and that’s it.

Eyecandy: bad. There was some though, but not enough.

Gameplay: Boring. Nothing fun about this level.

I give a tiny plus for the text sceneries that had a little sence of humor in them. They didn’t really make me laugh, but it’s fun to have funny text thingies in levels. At least, that’s what I think…

Waz’s Wise Words: spend more time on levels. Make a better layout.

Wha? If it is stoopid, why upload it? ;P[This review has been edited by Sabaspaz] (Unsupported rating removal. This is not a review, this is a question. Does the level have any features at all? Eyecandy? Gameplay? Design? Anything? What is bad? Is there nothing that is good? I NEED DETAILS TO SURVIVE. ~Violet)[This review has been edited by Violet CLM]