Review by mickie

Posted:
23 Feb 2005, 19:38
For: Back to Nature
Level rating: 8.5
Rating
N/A

pants

Review by DarkSonic

Posted:
13 Feb 2005, 21:28
For: Back to Nature
Level rating: 8.5
Rating
N/A

Just a comment, Skype. =P. You stole my quote about eye candy. =O
Because this is TSF, I can’t review this.

Review by Skype

Posted:
13 Feb 2005, 17:07
For: Back to Nature
Level rating: 8.5
Rating
N/A

pep[si] (reptile) right, Eyecandy is nice… btw. What is my Favorite Candy? Eyecandy >_<
(Reported unsupported rating removal. You didn’t really say anything besides “Eyecandy is nice” to justify your rating, and that one little comment isn’t enough. What makes it nice? What was the eyecandy like? For that matter, what was the rest of the upload like? ~Violet)

Review by Olsen

Posted:
13 Feb 2005, 10:22
For: Back to Nature
Level rating: 8.5
Rating
N/A

This is TSF BTW

[EDIT]
Also some eyecandypacked levels!

RecommendedReview by Ðx

Posted:
13 Feb 2005, 09:59
For: Back to Nature
Level rating: 8.5
Rating
8.5

Wow awsome really.

Eyecandy

Well this is 10 out of 10 the eyecandy is perfect mayby Overloaded even the first level defeats XLM woods. Really good.

Gameplay

Not spazz or jazz based its good, fine levels for duels. Ani. tiles ar good and no bugs or problems found, go futher to the other 2 levels ar also good. In level 3 some bugs but it does’t really care so much.

Ammo

Nice placed mayby to much but you can hold it with 16 players or something whe all see that later on.

I must say awsome. This deserve’s a 8.5

PS: Nice credits ;D

Review by Ðx

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: Battles in the Desert
Level rating: 8
Rating
8

Hey

And another great lvl

eyecandy

Very nice also you future level was
good LOST CANYON!
I miss again some mountains! anyway
GOOD!

Gameplay

Its fun, your levels ar 100% fun!
NO bugs and other thinks, i play with my friends it sometimes…

Ammo Placed

Not bad at all, good placed and also
not to HARD to get it. Good

Here a quick fast review by me

Tip: As i said: Make a battle pack :)

Here a 8[This review has been edited by Ðx]

Review by Dax105

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: Lost Canyon
Level rating: 8
Rating
N/A

You made a mistake in the information. This isn’t a 1.23 level, it seems to be a 1.24 as it conflicts with non-TSF JJ2. Please edit your information as it can mislead some people who download this and figure out it can’t be played.

Review by Ðx

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: Lost Canyon
Level rating: 8
Rating
8

Review

Eyecandy

Nice eyecandy only i miss the mountains
and the forest, anyway the back layer eyecandy is very good.

Gameplay

Very nice its very big also and ther is very
much fun in this battle. I founded some secrets
and some secret ammo that was hidden.

Ammo Placed

Very nice, just i told very nice ammo secrets and secret ways..

This was a quick review

Anyway here is a tip

Make a big battle with some tilesets…

~Ðx CC

Review by Jarno vos

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: Battles in the Desert
Level rating: 8
Rating
N/A

What Will You say with and we know all songs of my CD by heart ;-),

Review by Past of Leveldesign

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: Battles in the Desert
Level rating: 8
Rating
N/A

YAY, Blade wrote a review to our lvl, cool… (lol)

the password for hazarddesert: “rating10” (g)

And if you can’t find it on your home cooked list, maybe you’ve got more than 256 .J2L-levels

@Cooba: are you coobnoob??? :P[This review has been edited by Past of Leveldesign]

Review by cooba

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: Battles in the Desert
Level rating: 8
Rating
N/A

Blade, both levels are on Home Cooked list and Jazz Valley has no password. (OMG I HAVE SPOKEN TO GREAT BLADE YAY)

I played it once in Past’s server, and I have one comment : Dead Ends.

Isn’t it obvious? ;([This review has been edited by Cooba]

Review by Blade

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: Battles in the Desert
Level rating: 8
Rating
N/A

Very interesting… I didn’t find the jazzvalley.j2l and hazarddesert.j2l from my Home cooked list. And since you’ve locked the levels I can’t test them. A shame it is.[This review has been edited by Blade]

Review by Past of Leveldesign

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: DaLevel
Level rating: 6.5
Rating
N/A

Oh, yes, i see…
I fixed it, so you can’t get stuck so often…

hope that helps

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: DaLevel
Level rating: 6.5
Rating
6.5

NON PROOFREAD REVIEW ALERT!!!

Not a bad level at all. I’m going to mash all the reviewing areas together this time. All people usually really care about is gameplay and eyecandy, anyway.

————————————————————
Gameplay – Decent
————————————————————
Not bad at all. The flow is good enough, although there are one or two bugs here and there, and the level seems to work nicely for the most part. One of my biggest complaints is that the sucker tubes are extremely slow. It’d be nice if they were sped up a bit. I usually use a speed of 10 (or -10) minimum. Setting it to 10 makes it transport people exactly as fast as Jazz and Spaz can run at full speed. Another complaint is that the level seems very, very crampt (or is it cramped? Either way). It’s also kind of evil when you put a slope leading to a 90 degree angle (more specifically, a wall), and the wall has a floor right above it. It’d be much more convinient if you just stuck with one slope in those places, or perhaps even experimented with a floatup event. Position 45, 32 is one example of a place like this that bothers me. Another bothersome place is position 31, 28. A jagged edge like that makes you prone to getting stuck, and a one way event on the ledge hanging out there would be nice, anyway. Same with position 15, 23, but a one way event wouldn’t quite work there. Right in that area, first of all, there’s a jagged edge, and second of all, it’s very inconvinient for Jazz, who has to uppercut to get up to the ledge above there. Also, the whole bottom part of the level just annoys me. It’s confusing, evil, and it just annoys me.
————————————————————
Pros: Decent flow, gets the job done.

Cons: Not too much space, some issues, Spaz biased.
————————————————————
Eyecandy – Poor
————————————————————
The level’s appearance is lacking to begin with, but a lot of parts are just downright confusing. Some of the bricks that are meant for layer four are used in layer four, while others are used in layer five, to make up caves of some sort. While this is original and all, it’s confusing when you want to know what’s in layer four and what’s in layer five (in other words, what can be walked through and what can not). Many of the brick tiles are misused, too. Many of the edges of blocks of bricks don’t have the proper edge tiles, i.e. The waterfalls in the foreground are annoying, and get in the way. The background is very, very ugly. The level also suffers from upwards rain syndrome. When you jump, or are moving up for any other reason (sucker tubes, etc.), the rain (if it is rain) moves up as well. I’m not sure if it’s supposed to be rain, so I won’t take off anything. Oh, and I almost forgot the text events… they’re EXTREMELY annoying. Almost anywhere you go, there’s another text event that pops up on your screen. I usually limit my levels to a secret text event that says some inside joke or another, a credits text event, and a hidden text event saying who beta tested the level. I put the Vanish setting on all of them, so they can only be viewed once by each person until the level is reset.
————————————————————
Pros: I’ve seen worse.
Cons: Ugly, confusing, and full of irrelevant text events.
————————————————————
Overall – Not bad
————————————————————
This level isn’t bad at all. It’s not the best sized level there is, and it’s very ugly, but the gameplay is pretty decent. I wouldn’t host this or anything, but it’s not bad. No big download reccomendation, but it’s not something I would stay away from.
————————————————————
Pros: Decent.
Cons: Not all that good.
————————————————————[This review has been edited by labratkid]

Review by Fish99

Posted:
Posted more than 21 years ago
For: DaLevel
Level rating: 6.5
Rating
N/A
  1. 1
  2. 2