Jazz Jackrabbit 2 Online

I agree with Derby. His review made the most sense here. That’s why i love/hate this system….there are the few that make wonderful reviews, like Derby, and than the people that tend to throw things off and screw up the ratings.

Not that it only occurs here, but everywhere. So when you rate, please don’t have a bias, and vote truthfully and how you truely feel about the level.

Oh, and i wonder how FoD rated twice….gotta look at Fquist’s coding.

But as for you comment, Aiko, well, i’m not sure exactly what i want out of this site. A good downlaods system, private messeges, nice info, or whatever. But what i think this site should be is whatever you want it to be. This is based around user input, like the review system, for example. It relies on everyone’s input, not just a stand-alone person (not only that, we don’t have to go around rating levels. hehe. ;-P). And whatever anyone wants, we will try to provide it here and get it done. In facr, i’m working on a few things from user input. Well, not much as of yet, but it’ll only get better if you tell us what you want. If we guess at what you want, then it won’t necissarily be what you want.

So, the purpose of this site is whatever you want it to be.

~Cheeze

So the purpose of this site is to make people feel better?
I would like to know the webmasters opinion on that. However, i thought this was
for rating levels/tilesets/etc..

When teaching new things and ideas to other fans, you should make it more interesting, and more explorable, in a sense. A small level like that does not do very well for the example, but the "3" is the credit for finding it out for yourself and showing others how to do it. This may be the most positive review for this level, that can be looked at. The bottom line: Good job. You’re giving ideas to other JJ2 fans, which is a good thing. You’re just not taking any examples for others to follow, to a high level.

~ Derby

I’m not messing with the ratings, I’m trying to make allan feel better. Seems like all we get around here is negative reviews. Can’t you guys look for the good in things?!!?!?!?

(There are other ways of making new level makers feel better than to give them unfair ratings. I recommend you figure some out before reviewing any more levels such as this. -Trafton)[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]

Theres nothing good about this one folks. Except a nice new idea but
getting people to play within such a small space should be avoided.
Two points for orignality…

Please dont mess up ratings, FoD.
F quist, Cheeze and Bobby worked hard to get this great rating sytem finished.
Thank you in advance.

Why give it a 10 then?
Weird how it generates an access violation for most of us. It happened to me too.

I’m not sure I even want to download it.. my computer is too messed up already :P

Two skeleton monsters and a crate on a 2×8 layer 4, way boring really.

Huh? This is generating some nice Access Violations (my PC crashed!).
Return to sender please.

Sorry Mike but I think you went a little overboard. It works fine here. And I think allan only wanted to show us his strange stuff.

Thats right, a 1. The lowest rating possible. And this is the first level to get it. All 3 times I played this level it gave me an access violation and I had to restart windows because the error window would not go away no matter what I did.

I must say I don’t like this one too much. It’s like a hotel with places you can’t roast and it really doesn’t work very well for playing on the net. Sorry.

Its a bit like a hotel with rooms and stuff. It has some areas for battling, chatting
and whatever. The eyecandy isnt that attractive. I dont like this one too much, sorry.