RecommendedReview by Kastorp

Posted:
17 Nov 2018, 11:47
For: The Napoleonic Wars
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

I searched a long time for this upload, as Xobim said, it should be labelled as Single Player… ; I had played it ten years ago, and I found the gameplay uncommon for this game. It left me a lasting memory.

STORY
It is set in a middle of a war (before, and during it) To complete the levels, you have to “talk” with static characters. The story is somewhat consistent, and especially the fact that it takes a central place, although the texts are not that astonishing.

SYSTEM OF INDOORS/OUTDOORS
I found the idea of indoors/outdoors also good: some parts of the level were duplicated, and through a warp, you go in the building. Those warps are above the doors, so you may unwantedly warp in the building.

STRATEGY
To compare it properly, with elements from other single player games, I would say that the difficulty (enemy placement, strategy) is absent there. There are no ennemies but for two levels, where they are gathered in one place, in groups of 50 or 100, and with Spaz you get rid of them in one movement.

TILESET/VISUALS
The tileset isn’t especially beautiful.

Review by protomanz

Posted:
17 Jul 2007, 02:13
For: Conquest of the hill Castle
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

Your right it is a new type!

RecommendedReview by mirrow

Posted:
11 Sep 2005, 15:38
For: The Napoleonic Wars(1.23)
Level rating: 7.7
Rating
7.7

A war tileset :)

Ok what i mainly like about this tileset, is that you have a clear topic, and you have two site , unlike the usual blue/red you have spain with the brown basics and the war green for france(I suppose). I also like your color selection for the tiles not too funky rather settled pastel.
The masks works fine with me and i definitely like the spaz/jazz warriors :D nice job.

What you clearly miss out is the optimisation of the palette see layer 8(ask other ppl(notme) for some help if you have problems :) cough*disguise&toxicbunny*cough). Moreover does the tileset lack in eyecandy you have some detailed eyecandy part in which u certainly put some effort in, but they can’t fill a whole level. You are missing out layer 1,2 6,7 in my opinion.

Finally, I think your idea for this tileset is good and you have creativity, just get a bit more into those points i mention above.

Review by CraccoBoy

Posted:
19 Jun 2005, 23:24
For: The Napoleonic Wars(1.23)
Level rating: 7.7
Rating
N/A

I like it, it’s pretty good. Don’t feel like writing an entire review though.

Review by sonicdx

Posted:
25 May 2005, 12:20
For: Two Islands
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

SO!!! COOOOOOLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(Unsupported rating (7.5) removal. ~Violet)

Review by Xobim

Posted:
7 May 2005, 17:49
For: The Napoleonic Wars
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

I think this should be uploaded as ‘Single player’

And now, the review:

The tileset is used well, but the allover game was a bit boring and confusing.
Eyecandy was nothing special.
The last level was literally filled with enemies, making it hard and very annoying.
When I finally managed it to survive the last level, I got an error saying that there wasn’t a next level.

A 6 would be enough for this one, though the idea of making castles for CTF is good.
I’m not sure about bownload recommendtion; download it for a good CTF tileset. Don’t download it for the levels.

(Regrettably unsupported rating removal. Try actually reviewing the tileset as a tileset, not as a level pack. ~Violet)

Review by Electric Ir

Posted:
Posted more than 20 years ago
For: Blue Jazz
Level rating: 4.5
Rating
4.5

Blue Jazz

The author categorized this as ‘Multiple’, so I wonder what’s in this ZIP package. Now, what seems to be the case: this is just a Battle Level. Please choose the correct filetype next time.

The level makes use of Pavlik’s Blue World tileset. There is no textured background, background scenery or eyecandy. Sometimes you had really weird tile placement, e.g. the construction next to the fire shield.
There is no real gameplay and all of a sudden the screen gets a blue mask in the foreground, which looks dull.

- CONS:
No eyecandy, some minor tile bugs, overuse of ammo, no textured background, bad gameplay, no eyecandy.

+ PROS:
The author shows some original things like the transparent blue screen covering the foreground for a while.

VERDICT:
This is below average and I really can’t make more of it.

RATING:
4.5

Review by BlackRabite

Posted:
Posted more than 20 years ago
For: New Battle tileset
Level rating: 3.2
Rating
2.2

hurls

Just looking at it makes me sick…

Review by American

Posted:
Posted more than 20 years ago
For: New Battle tileset
Level rating: 3.2
Rating
3.2

Don’t rate, or have relatives or friends rate, your own stuff. It is quite against the rules.

Review by Piccolo aka SoulFirE

Posted:
Posted more than 20 years ago
For: New Battle tileset
Level rating: 3.2
Rating
4.2

The theme of this tileset is pretty unknown to me….
The tileset consists of grey stones, yellow things, 1 exit + 1 text sign, a few clouds, a few coloured blocks, vines and spikes.
It lacks (here comes the list again):
- eyecandy
- destr. blocks
- poles
- sucker tubes
- arrows
- textures

Next time, think of a GOOD and ORIGINAL THEME, add much eyecandy, don’t forget good textures and include all needed things (destr.blocks, poles, etc.)!!!!!!

Review by Møøñßlãzé aka Zãr¢h

Posted:
Posted more than 20 years ago
For: New Battle tileset
Level rating: 3.2
Rating
N/A

Nat and Pavlik, don’t rate your own stuff.
(Explained by they are brothers.)
And there where no download count until I downloaded.[This review has been edited by Møøñßlãzé aka Zãr¢h]

Review by Pavlik

Posted:
Posted more than 20 years ago
For: New Battle tileset
Level rating: 3.2
Rating
N/A

Yes this tileset is small
But your first.I will give you 5.2

(Do not rate your own levels. Rating removed. -Trafton)[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]

  1. 1