Well,this level i do like and its really cool…The eyecandy is good :)
the gameplay is good too,erm…there are some open spots but i think archer edited it XD…and didnt upload it ok i give it an 9.7.
(For credit)
This level is very small, bases reminds me on Golem Landscapes and I found 5 tilebugs on pos 31,42 ;under bouncer, under 48,40 ; 34,13 ; 88,39 ; 77,20. Nothing special with eyecandy, also nothing special with BG, textured without any color. Symmetrical CTFlvls are too bad because I think that you don’t have any idea,you just want upload sth :D
an okay level but quite open in some places.. meaning that it’s way too open. the floors are okay just like the float ups down though they don’t have a really good function in the level so they stay gimmicks from my point of view. i thought the base placement was nice although it looked a lot like golem landscapes. average level. normal eyecandy.
Looks like a decent battle level to play a simple duel in for something like ODT, but is by no means even worth anything close to a 10.
Nice level,though small. Gameplay is fine and I don’t see any tilebugs or eyecandy errors.
By the way. It’s Ancient. Not Acient.
Garden? Huh… Why you using word “Garden” two times? Next level will be Garden too?
Oh, acient forest, xD lol… i see what you changed it…
I like it.
its a decent level. it some very minor tilebugs but they manage to pass without noticing (atleast for me). only downside of this level is that its quite small. but everything else is fine :)
what does this level have to do with a garden..? :P
I don’t really know how to rate this. The eyecandy is nice,ammo placement nice,but the gameplay…? The gameplay isn’t horrible but it isn’t really great. Too small and open for normal battles,still open for duels… Still,the level doesn’t deserve a bad rating. I won’t rate it for now.
I know it… :)
This is very good battle level.
I like it.
Edit: SADLY SEE WHAT I CANT DELETE MY REVIEWS!!!
You should get some better testing and spend more time on your levels, because this is very mediocre and needs improvement in many ways. The level is small, unbalanced and a bit too open considering the size. The eyecandy is very poor. I don’t really see why anyone would want to play here, seeing as it doesn’t have anything going for it. Sorry =/
Hey, I dont like this lvl! A lot of bugs also game play here wont be fine, some things look very strange.. even lvl name Desert Street? wtf ;o
@Ron.
IDI** it doesnt look like distopia i didnt ask u to rate the level or anything else.
=P dont have a review again on my Lvls
AGAIN.
DISTOPIA’S LAGCLONE,uh,I mean,DESERT STREET:
EYECANDY
6.0
From all the tiles this tileset offers,you have only chosen a few hills that go over and over again. No buildings in the background or pipes or whatever,just some wall eyecandy. (The eyecandy looks familiar,you’ll know what I wanted to say.)
GAMEPLAY
6.5
Too open for a small map like that. As seen in some of your reviews,you don’t like levels with narrow passages. (“i hit only wall wall wall”) Same for me here,the eyecandy wall sometimes looked like the real layer 4 wall. You tried to make a level with a lot of open space. Fail. While Spaz,you could just jump up and down raining hell on your enemy using electroblasters for walls,bouncers when up and toaster while moving,forcing enemies to enter the fire wall. That sounds like “SPAZ BIASED” map.
For the bases: There are two possibilities of defending: NOT defending it because of enemy high ground advantage or using the FIRE WALL tactic,blocking every path to the base. The enemy would a) get the flag and destroy you or b) get owned himself without even capturing the flag. Really.
EDIT: I even got stuck at 60,24 in the lower corner. How could you make that?
ANOTHER EDIT: The blue base looks a bit like Distopia one.
PICKUPS
6.0
Already said much before. Powerup area too campy,same for the lower C.
OVERALL
6.2
I don’t know what to say. Here you go with a DL rec because the level is (barely) playable,but better than some other levels with the DL rec.
(You would probably expect a word from me so here it is: EVILNESS.)
@Skele: 1) I can review what I want. 2)Does that mean only your TM friends can come here and rate it 10?
@Crazy Rabbit: Please stop commenting reviews and REVIEW the level.
The eyecandy is not that bad. But…
The level is too small,it can be confusing,too much open space for a level,the warps are random…
Raul,learn to review.
5.8 for now,those 0.8 is because I like the eyecandy but nothing more.
EDITS. I rated this level lower than I wanted,because I rated a worse level higher. Here you go.
Can’t even see where i am walking. bad level, no download recommendation, what superjazz said. try better next time, make sure it isn’t so confusing. also, I hate people who can’t review normally. Raul, read some reviewing rules.
You might wanna try this, but you might as well not. This is a small CTF-level that is ok for a first level, but it pretty much isn’t more than that. It might be fun for a try, but this level should offer something special to be this small, and also more visuality, although there are no horrible tilebugs or such. Also the warps are confusing.
Huh?Just Good Job?eh…Not Even Real COMMENT :D
Jazz2Online © 1999-INFINITY (Site Credits). We have a Privacy Policy. Jazz Jackrabbit, Jazz Jackrabbit 2, Jazz Jackrabbit Advance and all related trademarks and media are ™ and © Epic Games. Lori Jackrabbit is © Dean Dodrill. J2O development powered by Loops of Fury and Chemical Beats.
Eat your lima beans, Johnny.