(Rating removal. -Trafton)[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]
its good not VERY much forest the tree dont work but its an 5.2 ( quotienta is standing left on me =D )
Yeah, Waz is right. I am a CRAPPY artist, and I work in paint, yet one of my tilesets got a 7. Say, an amazing (disguise-quality) tileset using paint came out, and you gave it a 5! That, I say, is unfair.
I have no intentions of downloading this, however. My list of tilesets is too large as it is.[This review has been edited by RSPSS FR]
Labratkid: “Never in my life will I give a tileset made with MS Paint over a 5.0. I refuse to, because they just come out looking bad.”
So, you never rate paint tilesets above 5? All my tilesets use paint, and none of them ever got lower than an average rating of 6(I even think my WORST tileset got 6.6). It’s not that hard to get things right with paint. Just check out my sets, they all use Paint, as I said. And I want you to take back what you said about paint sets, cuz you were wrong.
And using the “made with Paint” and “this is TSF” arguments as cons is just childish and unfair. Not evryone can aford something better than paint. And not evryone knows you can send a set to someone to let him compile it.
Ok, I might rate this stuff later, I didn’t even download it yet. I just saw Labratkids review, and I really wanted to say the things I wrote above.
Now for the tileset:
I’m sorry to say this, but this is probably the worst Paint tileset I’ve seen. Keep trying though, you will get it some day. I’m not gonna give a rating. It would seriously damage you’re average rating. But I know how people often struggle with Paint, but it’s possible to get good things out of it. Check out my article about making tilesets. There’s a hint for a better palette. My sets use paint to. And they’re almost all above average, and that might encourage you.[This review has been edited by Waz]
Er, Lab? That’s Disguise’s new tileset, not Blade’s.
This tileset is better than a lot of tilesets made with paint. It actually shows effort. 5.0 is a good rating (see the first review) but 2.5 is a little too low for this, considering it shows effort.
1.) Nice colors.
2.) The brick tiles look kind of nice.
3.) The rocks with arrows look nice.
4.) The sign doesn’t look half bad.
1.) Made with paint.
2.) Simple, textureless tiles, no real background except for a solid, ugly dark green tile.
3.) Other stuff.
4.) If you choose to use that green tile as the backgroud, you won’t be able to see any trees or grass, so you’re best off using the uglier purple background tile.
1.) There is one animating tile, which is a hotel style vine. After testing it, I found that it works smoothly.
2.) There are some destructable things, like * blocks and ! blocks. There is also a sign that could be made shootable.
1.) Not much animation…
2.) You shouldn’t really make the vines like that unless it’s in a hotel. But, they are there, so it’s good.
1.) Not a bad mask.
2.) It’s not automasked. Yipee!
3.) The trees are unmasked, except for the very top, Diamondus style.
1.) Nothing really specially here.
2.) The rock tiles are unmasked. They should’ve been masked so you could use them as a wall, don’t you think?
3.) You should’ve had the tree mask look just like the top of the regular tree, rather than redoing it, because it looks kind of funny. Nothing major here, though.
1.) If you use the green background, you can’t see any trees or grass.
2.) If you choose the purple background, you can’t see any shootable blocks, or purple balls / squares.
1.) Shows effort.
2.) Not terrible.
3.) Decent mask.
4.) Not auto-masked.
1.) It works with only TSF. Make all small tiles 1.23 compatible. The only reason you should EVER make a tileset 1.24 only is either because you don’t like 1.23 people for some reason, or the tileset is huge (like Mega Megatropolis, or whatever it was called… Disguise’s newest, and final tileset). That one is over 1,000 tiles, so he HAD to make it with 1.24 or else it would throw an error. This tileset is very small, so you should’ve made it with 1.23.
2.) Bad colors.
3.) Rather bad graphics.
4.) Not much animation.
5.) Made with paint.
6.) Awful looking background that makes some tiles un-seeable (is that a word? =P)
This isn’t really worth the download, all though it’s probably the best MS Paint tileset I’ve come across in my days on J2O and JJ2.
Final: 4.7[This review has been edited by labratkid][This review has been edited by labratkid]
Here I go!
And yet another MS paint tileset. This tileset consists of a few platforms in 6 geometrical forms (=O), some trees, grass, spikes, blocks and some stuff I don’t recognize. The colors don’t fit together. None of the objects are shaded, and the tileset really looks like if it’s your very first tileset. Keep on trying :P
Quotentia, I suggest you to download PSP (evaluation version ;) and make your next tileset with that program. Also look at JCSref or Disguise’s tileset site to learn a few basic things. Also try to be original; this set is in no way different from other first tilesets uploaded here; those sets also include circles in the colors you used.
As I said, keep on trying.
This tileset didnt have so much forest tileset, and those color tiles are useless.i didnt like this tileset, but good luck to your next tilesets!
Eat your lima beans, Johnny.