Jazz Jackrabbit 2 Online

weeh!

1-BUGS! i tolt you… let me betatest! not vegito!
2-EYECANDY!
3-good ammo placed.
4-small/bad

download reccomed: what you whant ;)
host this often: No

A battle level
And not a bad one.
_______________________________________

Nice layout but some bugs in the finishing tuch.
Its funny to play but its spazz basicly, i see after a spring you must spring to get up it.
But its NOT bad and NOT Good a fun level, a 7.0[This review has been edited by Amstel]

Hmm okay, again a ctf level.
All of you ctf levels has much ammo, you dont must put to much. the eyecandy is Avarage (so as i can see) your levels arent bad, but i think it likes a bit more as battle’s i think you must make battle levels likes this. a 7!

Dx… you have betatest it wrong..

you say this:
_________________________________
1-some eyecenady
2-TO MUCH ammo placed
3-bases placed: OK
4-springs placed: Okey
5-other:Okey!
________________________________
Have you say to da man this:

remove some ammo or something
have you say make more eyecandy?
And why you rate the spring place :S
If you betatest this better you had give this a higher raiting

Oke
i said: BUGS ( i betatest it :P )

1-some eyecenady
2-TO MUCH ammo placed
3-bases placed: OK
4-springs placed: Okey
5-other:Okey!

oke, ik give this a 6.7
next time fix the bugs, look good in the tilesets
and i must say: yor levels become better.
so….
eh
…
..

———————————————————————————
Download recommed: mayby
Host this: Nope/ mayby

oke….

i am bored ;)

lissen 007.
i betatest it, i said: MAKE MORE EYECANDY and other things!
he did’t lissen so……..[This review has been edited by dx dc]

DX You say in this revieuw
Very much bugs
You have beta test it
have you told there how many bugs there?
if you have told that he makes it verry better

Eyecandy – Bad
At least there’s a background… the sprite layer and layer 3 eyecandy suck too bad, though.
Gameplay: Very bad
Yuck. Jazz can barely get around it, and Spaz has a hard time, too.
Flow: Very bad
Bad flow… spring placement sucks.
Ammo: Very bad
This is the first ‘very bad’ ammo placement I’ve issued. This is pretty darn bad.
Layout: Very bad
goes in the bathroom and comes out an hour later weighing 10 pounds less, then eats for the next day non-stop to gain the weight back
Download reccomendation: No.
Host this often: No.
Overall: No. Very bad. Try harder next time, and focus on the gameplay. No offense to your beta testers, but have people who are good at level making test your levels, because if you take advice from someone whose not good, what good is the advice?

:| lutijn…

1-assault?!??
2-very much bugs.
3-boring
4-you cant get up ( lori mayby jazz to )
5-Boring gameplay.
6-Bad eyecandy, only at the fourgrond and layer 7 i think….

an 7.2?!?!? wow.
an 6.5 from me.

next time lissen to me.

make the bugs fixt!
and the size is oke…
lutijn is very bad at betatesting!
oke, an 6.5 from me.

[This review has been edited by dx dc]

Hmm, this level is not good/bad.
I think you must use the whole level for CTF likes one base above and one down, under you never must come to score! this level you can use for Battle to, i think..

::For all of this a nice 7.2!::

Trafton: Rating removal.[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]

A nice level, but again its have some places with no eyecandy or spring room…

Dx about number2 Its small
Have you says that To?
I don’t think that a small lvl get an 7.5:I

Bah. Not so good. DX overrated this big time.
Eyecandy – Bad
Bad eyecandy… all though there is a background, and that’s all ways good. The eyecandy in other places if just annoying and ugly. Some tiles don’t go together.
Gameplay – Bad
Bad gameplay. Expect a boring time, especially if you’re Jazz. Frusturating, too.
Flow – Bad
Bad flow… the spring placement is annoying, and some places lack springs. Jazz can’t reach many areas, for example, on top of the floating building. Spaz can barely reach that, either.
Layout – Bad
Hideous layout.
Ammo placement – Okay
The ammo placement is merely okay… nothing good, though.
Size – Bad / okay
Not so good, but at least it’s A LITTLE big…
Host this often – Not a chance… it’s 1.24, anyway.
Download – No.
DX: Rate everything 1.0 points lower than you would normally rate them, and your ratings will be far more reasonable. Also, look at the gameplay… don’t rate levels high just because they look neat, or your friends made them, or you beta tested it. GAMEPLAY is everything. Flow, etc. The level has to be enjoyable and easy to get around in for good gameplay. I never see you look at the gameplay when rating.

hmmmmmmmmmm.

first when i played it for the first time i found bugs.
i said it to him and he made it better.

Oke…

1-good eyecandy.
2-small :(.
3-not much ammo but its OkEy.
4-the bases ar to close to eachother… but it dont metter.

oke, i give this an 7.5.

download recommed: hmmm if you like ctf…
host this often? i dont think so..

Ps: i am now an betatester, if you whant to let test yor levels, put me on msn!
msn: Ruwandx12@msn.com

i am bored so let me betatest thinks!

Third CTF review this week. Let’s begin, shall we?

GAMEPLAY:

I’ve seen worse. I can’t say this is much of an improvement. There are once again useless deadends, questionable spring placement, and even more deadends. One can imply that there are more deadends than before. Furthermore, there’s a slight lack of flow, a spaz bias, and a huge empty so. This level reminds me lot of Death Castle CTF which is not really a good thing. Some more variety would be nice, wouldn’t it? There’s still poor base placement (and generally in the same places as before) and it’s still unbalanced. Bases in each corner of the level are hard to balance so I advise avoiding this.

EYE CANDY:

“Explosive Garden CTF” isn’t exactly exploding with eye candy. The eye candy would have been average, but once again the tileset is misused in a lot of places. This is a bad sign. Please take my advice and try to make eye candy like that seen in good levels (not just any level). Also, try not to hide too many things with foreground eye candy. Doing that will annoy players a lot.

CARROT AND AMMO PLACEMENT:

Carrot placement is like how it was before: a full energy carrot in a warp. Not too bad, but it just makes this level more like the last CTF one. As for ammo placement, it seems to be too random. Good thing: ammo placed througout the level for easy access and strategical reasons. Bad thing: ammo placed around the level for the sake of placing ammo around the level. I might have lost a lot of people who are reading this review with those last few lines, but it is true so go ask someone who’s made a lot of CTF levels for a detailed explanation (I’m too lazy to do it now myself, although PMs can be useful). The powerup placement isn’t as bad, though. If the RF was placed a little further to the right, it would have been a little better (assuming there won’t then be an empty space where the powerup was). Of course, they are just out in the open and rather easy to access, so it’s pretty dull and all. Something like a powerup only accessible with some Electro Blasters through a wall is a nice change from the ordinary.

HOST THIS OFTEN?

That answer is still a no. This is worth about a 6.2, so next time try even harder.

is tired of reviewing the same level for such a long time once again

an 7.2 from me.

You found very much bugs, and its not to big, why you give then a 7.2? i gonna review it later, when i have time

Review :

Your levels gonna be better and better, this one is nice. Maybe you can make it next time easyer for Jazz, this is – i think – only for spazz, with Jazz you cant get Up to other flag, but its nice enough for a 7.2[This review has been edited by ~BunnyBee[TF]]

oke.

1-little good eyecandy.
2-I FOUND VERY VERY MUCH BUGS.
3-good ammo placed.
4-nice background.

oke its good next time make it bigger, but its very big you think
i know but you can make good CTF levels.
but find the bugs ar betatest yor levels, ( i am an betatester )
if you whant to betatest somthing just put me on msn:Ruwandx12@msn.com.
and make yor levels better!

an 7.2 from me.

This is TSF :(

An okay level. It lacks flow, and the layout is bad. The ammo placement is decent, and I can all most say the background eyecandy is good, but layer 5 moves too fast. There is lots of ugly stuff in the sprite layer, but lots of eyecandy there. However, it’s too much, making a lot of eyecandy turn into bad eyecandy. It’s buggy, like DX said. The gameplay has way too many flows for this to be an enjoyable level.

Foo, DX, you reviewed it; how can you not want to review it if you all ready did?[This review has been edited by labratkid]

Good job, Da man, you really should make levels like this…Hey , hey i forget one thing , i decided to write an a long review:

Tileset use:Tileset use is very good in someparts, especially in those platforms..

BTW, ill continue this tomorrow , im too tired right now.

BUGS BUGS BUGS! sorry i found much much and VERY much bugs…

1- bad eyecandy.
2- good/bad ammo placed.
3- SMALL!

i dont whant to review dis level.

6.7 from me.

Ps: i agree with ~bunny bee {TF}