Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Brown brick CTF
Level rating: 6.6
Rating
6.7

What BlurredD said, basically, but I think the eyecandy is pretty neat. ;p There is biasing, which makes it good, and the gameplay flows okay. It could be better. The idea of making a hotel that you play CTF in is very original.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Rabbit Town CTF (updated)
Level rating: 2.9
Rating
3

I’m afraid BlurredD is overrating, even with that low rating. The eyecandy sucks, Jazz basically CAN’T play the level, and it’s linear in many places, and… it’s just to boring to want to play.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: The City Of Tuf Turtles!!!!!!!!
Level rating: 5.7
Rating
5.5

This is much better than your other levels, Bjarni.
Eyecandy – Okay
The eyecandy isn’t bad, but it isn’t good. It’s just average, and kind of boring at some times. They is a layer 7, which is good.
Gameplay – Bad
The gameplay is rather bad here, because it’s linear (a lot of the ground is just flat ground that you have to run on a while). Good gameplay involves plenty of jumping, and turning around, and stuff.
Originalitiy: N/A
This isn’t too original. There is a warp that sends you to a spike pit with lots of turtles, and it says, “Bye-bye.” This idea was used in an older level, “Rabbitaria.” The boss also had a, “Fooruman” type attitude, like telling you that you sux endlessly ;p
Ammo: N/A
Hardly any ammo here.
Enemies: N/A
All Tuf turtles… no rating here.
Overall: Okay
This is a very average and short level. Good job, keep up the good work.

That’s because, DX, you have too many levels. Delete some sux levels, and get the number under 255.[This review has been edited by labratkid]

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Diamond Battle
Level rating: 6
Rating
N/A

Bloodrabbit, you are starting to act like Nick DC. Keep rating levels 10, and I will nickname you Bloody Nicholas the Rabbit and will never rate your levels again. 0wnage.

(Personal attack removal edit. -Trafton)[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Snooz's strange universe
Level rating: 7
Rating
7

Hmm, 9.7 is really overrating. There is a risk of the flag bug here, because there isn’t a mask around the whole level. You loose some points for that. It is also severely Spaz biased… the eyecandy is very unique, original, and cool, and the size is nice. The gameplay is all right, but I’ve seen better. Download reccomendation, I guess ;p

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Neons JTF
Level rating: 7.5
Rating
N/A

It’s a ripoff on Blackraptor’s level. Same tileset, same concept, same ideas.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Water Battle (Version 1.01)
Level rating: 5.5
Rating
N/A

Use the reupload function, foo X(

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Dungeon of Doom
Level rating: 3.3
Rating
2

I understand this is your first level. People’s first levels are never good, unless you are ScizorCT ;p The eyecandy sucks big time, there is hardly any gameplay, and there wasn’t much thought as to where the ammo was placed… good try for a first. I’ve all ways found single player levels much, much easier to create, especially if you’re new, because you don’t need to focus on gameplay quite as much. Just don’t make the level linear ;p My first single player level pack that I released is on the site somewhere… Labrat HQ. It’s very bad, but my next level, Freezing Hell Hunt, go better, and my third level, Battleships got a 7.2 or 7.4 (I’m too lazy to look). Than, after I got good with single player, I tried my luck at capture the flag… Pepsi vs. Coke got 7.7. After I got bored of levels, I tried tileset conversions. My first got 3.0 (BOO!) My next got a bit higher, until I made JJ1: Industrius and Xargon, which both got 8.0. Than, I tried making my own tileset and I got 8.2. Hooray.

So, you should try starting out with single player, than try your luck with battle, than capture the flag, and than a tileset. It worked for me.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: 2 treasure levels
Level rating: 3.3
Rating
2

Gamer is overrating. These SERIOUSLY SUCK.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Treasury town
Level rating: 6.2
Rating
6.5

This level is also very nice, but it’s still too small. It’s original because you put it all under water. I’ve never seen a treasure level taking place only underwater ;p I have a room in this, too, and so does DX… you should give more people rooms =)

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Water Battle
Level rating: 3.9
Rating
4

WELL NOW. The author put in Battle1, 2, 3, and 4.j2l! Battle1 is his level, and battles 2, 3, and 4 are the default battle levels. NOW ARE GAMES ARE MESSED UP THANK YOU!!! -.5 for this annoyance. You’re off to a bad start. The eyecandy is overdone, and just comes out to an annoyance, the gameplay is bad, and you get stuck a lot, it’s buggy, and the ammo placement is bad.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Snooz's treasure hotel v1.0
Level rating: 7.3
Rating
7.2

Yay, I have a room =D This is original, and unoriginal at the same time. It’s original in the sense that it’s a hotel that is turned into a treasure hunt, but the look and feel of it has a strange resemblance to, “Five Golden Star Hotel.” +10.0 for giving me a room ;p Just kidding. It’s a bit small, but has fun gameplay. Overall, it’s a good treasure hunt level, mixed in with the popular hotel gametype.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Batty
Level rating: 4.7
Rating
4.7

Hmm, not quite as bad… it uses Omega’s awful Alien Carnage tileset conversion. Use mine – it has all the tiles, and the size is correct… plus, it’s not automasked. The eyecandy here is minimal, all though Omega didn’t give you much eyecandy to work with, so I’ll let you go, since it’s Omega’s fault. (ever seen the South Park movie? They’re all saying, “Blame Canada.” Now, we can say, “Blame Omega!” ;p). No offense… Anywaaaay… this level is a bit hard, and it’s surprisingly advanced for your second level! It even uses ambient sounds, the art of making it look like a tile is moving up and down, trigger scenery… very impressive mechanics for a second try. Keep trying… I see potential in you.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Firetempel 3
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

I get an access violation, too. >(

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Fíré Báttlé
Level rating: 4
Rating
4

Whatever TE VEEL BLOKJES!!!!!! means, it’s false. This level is just like your others… boring, small, bad weapons placement, bad gameplay, bad eyecandy. Use a tileset that requires SOME skill to make a good level out of, and I’ll respect your attempts more.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Thé Básé Ráçé
Level rating: 3
Rating
3

Whoa. Total time for all 3 laps – about 10 seconds. Boring eyecandy, too small, and just too low quality.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Içé Ráçé
Level rating: 5.4
Rating
4.7

Too small!! It’s also very boring… you could beat all 3 laps in under 30 seconds. The eyecandy is bad, too, and it’s just way too slow moving.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Ðx Høtél
Level rating: 6.3
Rating
5.7

Well, this is not what I expected. Very nice. =D

The icecream factory is neat and original.

Getting salary is also creative.

The eyecandy isn’t half bad (but, it’s not half good, either ;p)

The test isn’t too hard, and you get way too much for beating it.

Overall, not bad, but small.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Inside lava lamp
Level rating: 4.1
Rating
4

It’s okay, but it’s extremely boring, and the eyecandy is bad. Skulg’s easy to use tilesets get abused by you people :( The gameplay is rather bad, and slow moving, but it’s not Spaz biased, which is a good thing. There is also no next level, so everyone’s game will crash in multiplayer when it is complete.

Review by Lark

Posted:
Posted more than 22 years ago
For: Lizart hunt
Level rating: 5.6
Rating
3.2

Not too bad for your first level, but it could’ve been much, much better. The eyecandy sucks, and the gameplay is boring, and it’s easy. I’m sorry, but you are supposed to rate all levels on the same scale, no matter if it’s your first or your 100th.

  1. 1
  2. …
  3. 11
  4. 12
  5. 13
  6. 14
  7. 15
  8. 16
  9. 17
  10. 18
  11. 19
  12. …
  13. 27