- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Something fishy
- Level rating: 7.5
its great but ther ar to much seekers + RF! so i give an 7.5
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Something fishy
- Level rating: 7.5
Rather good, I’d say…
Tileset use: teh tileset use was correct. I didn’t see any mistakes. Some tiles didn’t really seem to fit together, and I looked for other tiles that might, but none could fit one those spots. So I guess it’s the tilesets fault.
Events: v-poles and weapons. That’s it I think. The weapon placement was a little below average. Too much RF and seekers, I say.
Layout: Interresting layout. Nothing new or anything. Very playable level, kinda fun.
Eyecandy: Nothing on layer 5-7. On layer 4, only those eyes, and that’s about it. I must say the tileset doesn’t offer a very great choise of eyecandy, and thus the eyecandy won’t be taken into consideration in my rating.
Overall: fun level, nothing special thoug. Maybe good to host sometime.
7.2
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Far out
- Level rating: 6.1
“Heck, do I get extra points if I upload my tileset number 14?”
It depends on if you rate it yourself, or if you get someone to rate it high for you. Or if people are biased towards you.
So probaly no.
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Far out
- Level rating: 6.1
Yeah, this set is avarage. Avarage is the middle rating, 5, not 6.7 which is close to 7 (Over avarage). You’r over rating this. Why? Because:
-Tiles are too simpel.
-Bad colours.
-Boring background layers.
-The set is overall “flat”.
-The sucker tubes mask is bad.
-The “space” background is neither blue or black, but brown which is ugly.
Please stop over-rate people’s stuff because it’s their “first”, “second”, and “third”. Heck, do I get extra points if I upload my tileset number 14?
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Far out
- Level rating: 6.1
Pretty average, which is good. Average means you’re on your way.
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Far out
- Level rating: 6.1
Cool, dude.
Good Stuff:
- easy to use
- good use of background layers
- a few unique blips to put in
Bad Stuff:
- overly simplistic (too much repetition)
- eye candy (texture would help it a lot)
Not bad for your 3rd tileset! Don’t be afraid to put something original in it to spice it up.
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Far out
- Level rating: 6.1
This is a surprisingly good tileset. It looks a lot like many of Skulg’s tilesets (for example, Death Metal, and Lava Lamp). It’s a very simple and small tileset with minimal animations, but so were most of Skulg’s. I would rate this higher if you put in some animations besides that alien thing.
Download reccomendation for level building n00bs who want their levels to look nice, and not have a hard time building them.
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Just another battle pack
- Level rating: 6.2
This is nice. Any lvl is not bad. I RATE TO U A BIGGER NUMBER.
(Rating removal. Please give sense-making reviews. -Trafton)[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Abandoned nature
- Level rating: 4.2
First of al it must be have more tiles, and the tile’s that it have are bad tile’s… srry
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Metal wasteland
- Level rating: 5.3
Weird.
Good Stuff:
- layers work well together
- doesn’t distract from sprites too much
Bad Stuff:
- eye candy needs work
- needs much more detail
- includes only bare necessecities
- no apparent theme(s)
- windows look cool, but don’t belong
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Metal wasteland
- Level rating: 5.3
I like the tileset. The level is a bit short. It is still a good level. Make more levels with this tileset. I’ll give them good ratings.
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Metal wasteland
- Level rating: 5.3
This level doesn’t deserve in the 7’s, but it’s not THAT bad, and doesn’t deserve as low as a 3. If it was made with paint, it’s very good for a paint set, but if not, it’s still PRETTY good. It’s what I like to call a n00bset – Which means it’s a great set for newbies on level making to use, and it’s easy to use. An example is Skulg’s tilesets – Death Metal was a great tileset that is easy to use, and so is Lava Lamp. This tileset looks like it’d be fun to make levels with.
Download reccomendation is complicated.
Those of you who have a lot in common with Spaztic, Evil Mike, Violet CLM, etc. stay away from this.
Those of you who aren’t as good as making levels, and I won’t use any names, this is a perfect download for you guys.
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Metal wasteland
- Level rating: 5.3
Ah, I dont like that tileset!!
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Metal wasteland
- Level rating: 5.3
THEME: Not much of one. The author seems to have copied the whole idea from Blade’s Wasteland, but not been too clear on what idea he was copying. Anyway, the tileset ends up as a bunch of bright white metal blocks with some plants and weird background mountains.
Pros: Few.
Cons: Not much of a theme, what little theme there is not very expanded upon.
Rating: 5.0
GRAPHICS: Really quite bad. The very few places there is any shading at all is quite jerky, no textures, and most everything looks ugly. The only saving grace is the plants, which actually look kind of ok, despite not fitting in with the tileset at all.
Pros: The plants.
Cons: Most everything else.
Rating: 2.0
INVENTORY: Text sign, spikes, poles, vine.
Pros: Some stuff is there.
Cons: A lot of the things are missing, what there is isn’t very well masked, nor does it have all that good graphics…
Rating: 3.5
ORIGINALITY: There really is nothing that is original about this tileset. Everything is basically taken from something else or shouldn’t have existed in the first place.
Rating: 1.7
COMPETITION: Wasteland. Just about any metal tileset, really.
(No pros given)
(No cons given)
(No rating given)
EASE OF USE: This is probably the best factor. Assuming you can tell what a tile is supposed to be, you will pretty much know where to put it, and where it is. The only complaint here is that the extra [] eyecandy stuff has to be squares or it won’t work at all, completely destroying all the usability potential.
Pros: Mostly good.
Cons: Those [] things.
Rating: 6.0
MASKING: Ick. The masking on this tileset is just horrible. Jagged edges, little dots, stuff with masking not at all like the tile itself… hint: people like smooth, bugless masks.
Pros: The tileset’s masking is, at least, usable.
Cons: Way too many bugs.
Rating: 2.2
OVERALL: This is hard to rate overall, as each of the sections has gotten significantly different ratings. Still, this is just not a very good tileset, despite what Superjazz and this guy I’ve never heard of seem to think.
Pros: Not too many. But the tileset is usable, and you can make a level with it.
Cons: Bugs, missing things, not very good graphics.
Rating: 3.2
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Metal wasteland
- Level rating: 5.3
Well, because I have rated today so many jj2 levels I’m tired to rate this fully, and I also have other rating sections for tilesets than I have for sp, so let’s say it straight and decide the rating number.
Well, seems that you have skill on making tilesets and levels too, ehm, except you should make longer example levels or then do not make them at all. Well, tileset seems to be quite fine and useful, but should have more tiles and animated tiles, eyecandy, etc. So I decided to give at first a 7 like Mike, but I give 7.2 because the example level. And remember to make them longer next time. By the way, are you a finn, snooz?
Well, I guessed that, because you write like a finn, and then I checked your profile and saw your e-mail. Finnish language, and because I’m a finn too.
Superjazz was here
[This review has been edited by Superjazz]
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Metal wasteland
- Level rating: 5.3
Ok mike, i will make longer example levels next time.yes, im form finland superjazz, how did you guess?[This review has been edited by snooz]
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Metal wasteland
- Level rating: 5.3
What?? I’m first to rate this? Well, let’s get going.
Layer 4 graphics: 6
Backround: 6.7
Useability: 8
Tile placing:7.3
Overall:7
I felt a little unsure about downloading this ‘cause it wasn’t rated, but i don’t regret downloading. Just put a longer example level next time, OK?
BTW, I am a finn too, and I don’t think you always know who is a finn. But I think Blade is.
[This review has been edited by Mike]
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Just another battle pack
- Level rating: 6.2
As DanX said in his review of my Battleships 2 level…
“Two words: Too small.”
There are 3 teeny weeny levels here with good eyecandy, and decent ammo placement. They’re not bad or anything, but they’re really small. When you make levels, make them bigger, and spend a long time on them.
Here’s a good average rating.
Merry Christmas.
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Abandoned nature
- Level rating: 4.2
Ok, a first set. Always fun to see that…
Inventory:
There’s some xtra stuff, such as blocks, spikes I think, vines,… And some eyecandy for layer 4 and 5-7.
Graphics: Plain bad. But at first graphics hardly ever turn out well.
Ease of use: This is very easy to use, and not to big. Good!
Competition/Originality(doesn’t count in rating): In my list of favorite nature tileset, this one would probably end up somewhere at the bottom, to say things clearly. There’s nothing original about the set. But originality isn’t the most important thing with me…
What it all looks like: It doesn’t look that great, actually. It’s not “jazzy” either(that means it doesn’t really fit the game).
Overall: nice try, but didn’t reach the average. Keep making sets, this one’s promissing.
No download reccommandation.
I give 3.
- Posted:
- Posted more than 21 years ago
- For: Snoozs newest battlepack
- Level rating: N/A
The Levels are very, very good, but when i play them on the Internet, i get sometimes an error and JJ closed automatic.
Is that a bug?
or i have only this problem!?