Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
27 Feb 2011, 19:44
For: To the joy
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

Why bother using the 1.23 version if you made the level in TSF?

Not recommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
24 Feb 2011, 08:45 (edited 24 Feb 11, 08:46)
For: Battle2 No fire zone
Level rating: 5.3
Rating
1.1

uploads like this make me cringe
1.1 since I guess it does have a purpose but really is there any skill in filling a premade level with no fire zones?

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
11 Feb 2011, 18:34
For: Sovun Valtakunta
Level rating: 8.4
Rating
8.3

;0

Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
9 Feb 2011, 22:49
For: Carrotus water level
Level rating: 7.5
Rating
N/A

@King: I’m pretty certain aritra was ranking the download in question, not his own review.

Not recommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
8 Jan 2011, 06:54
For: UNINHABITABLE BATTLE PACK
Level rating: 7.8
Rating
5.5

..Seriously dated. C-

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
12 Dec 2010, 19:19 (edited 24 Mar 15, 15:00)
For: Scars of Chaos 2: War Torn Existence
Level rating: 9.7
Rating
9.8

Generally polished through and through, SC2 promises consistent, long term enjoyment. These levels, being familiar to most by now, have a lasting legacy, particularly in JDC events. The fact that these levels are still just as playable as ever says a lot.

Quick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
10 Dec 2010, 14:47
For: Ice Age
Level rating: 7
Rating
6.9

Awesome pseudo-3D background. The concept of the tileset is clear, but lacks the execution to back it up. The levels themselves are pretty forgettable. For what it is, it’s a good effort. C+

Quick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
10 Dec 2010, 14:31 (edited 21 Jan 13, 22:17)
For: Substracted Space
Level rating: 6.7
Rating
7

A prime example of experimentation gone wrong. Birdie started a fire going, in which he did not have the power to control. Ambition and creativity should be applauded, but almost all functionality is lost; these are MP levels we are talking about.

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
10 Dec 2010, 14:15
For: Test levels and a casino
Level rating: 9.4
Rating
8.5

Solid collection of noteworthy tests that provide simple entertainment on a rainy day. A-

Quick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
10 Dec 2010, 14:01
For: Forgotten Treasures
Level rating: 7.2
Rating
7.3

Minimalism can be good a thing given the right circumstances, but to what cause for this pack? While there’s nothing rancid, it seems sloppy around the edges. Toni isn’t afraid to show his lazy side – he copies one level and makes another version of it as pure filler. There’s some enjoyment in the pack, but don’t bother digging for gold. B-

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
9 Dec 2010, 11:22 (edited 10 Dec 10, 14:03)
For: GaLaXiuS
Level rating: 7.9
Rating
8.1

A JDC classic. Featuring a simple but effective two levels of height design, this is a versatile level that works in all game sizes. The middle section connects the two levels well and provides plenty of entertainment. However, this level is pretty bland looking by today’s standards, although many will enjoy the miminalist feel of the level. B+

Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
30 Nov 2010, 16:02
For: Catacomb
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

No carrots?

Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
30 Nov 2010, 15:59 (edited 30 Nov 10, 16:01)
For: Reigning on Raneforus
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

One complaint I have is the background is seriously messed up.
Why would any distant, static object ever move faster than something closer? Not only does this break the laws of perspective, it looks ridiculous enough that it is distracting.

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
31 Oct 2010, 14:33
For: Dream Stage
Level rating: 8.9
Rating
8.6

Visually wonderful.

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
28 Oct 2010, 16:56 (edited 10 Dec 10, 19:35)
For: Lava Fortress v2
Level rating: 9.2
Rating
8.2

The lava really needs to be more flexible! otherwise k

B

Not recommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
26 Oct 2010, 10:11 (edited 10 Dec 10, 19:36)
For: Meteor Shower Facility
Level rating: 6.8
Rating
4.7

Somewhat messy. The foreground ec, despite being part of the theme, is extremely obstructive. The layout is far too simple and open, and generally the level looks pretty ugly. Sorry. D

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
20 Jul 2010, 12:14 (edited 6 Aug 10, 06:31)
For: Minimal Duel
Level rating: 8.6
Rating
8.4

This proves that complexity is not necessary for a level to be fun. While the gameplay feels somewhat familiar, the level is highly enjoyable so why does that matter? :P

Not recommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
19 Jul 2010, 17:31 (edited 10 Dec 10, 19:37)
For: MULCH
Level rating: 7
Rating
3

fun for about 30 seconds. D-

Quick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
18 Jul 2010, 07:50 (edited 10 Dec 11, 22:50)
For: Blizzard
Level rating: 8.9
Rating
7.2

Tried using the set. It really is a pain to use, for it is so incredibly lacking in necessary tiles. I’m pretty sure every level made with this set will look exactly the same. It’s a shame, since the set at least looks nice.

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
13 Jul 2010, 09:52 (edited 10 Dec 10, 19:42)
For: Dark Cave
Level rating: 7.3
Rating
7.5

I like the theme, especially with the lovely looking water . However, I would’ve like to have seen this aspect expanded on further, and the whole tileset in general could’ve had a lot more content. Still, nice. B

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9